期刊文献+

64排CT对冠状动脉旁路移植术后桥血管病变的诊断研究 被引量:1

Diagnostic study on the coronary artery bypass grafts lesions using 64 multi-slice computed tomography angiography
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价64排螺旋CT血管造影(MSCTA)对冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)术后桥血管病变诊断的准确性。方法2005年7月至2007年4月,共228例患者于CABG术后复查64-MSCTA,其中31例患者(82支桥血管)因有心绞痛或CT结果提示桥血管损害,进一步行冠状动脉造影(CAG)。结果所有桥血管均获得评价。64-MSCTA共发现13支桥血管闭塞,均得到CAG证实。CAG发现15支桥血管严重狭窄,64-MSCTA发现14处,漏诊1处,误诊1处。64-MSCTA诊断冠状动脉桥狭窄的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和与CAG符合率分别为93.3%、98.1%、93.3%、98.1%和97.1%;诊断桥血管病变的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和与CAG符合率分别为96.4%、98.1%、96.4%、98.1%和97.6%。结论64-MSCTA可以准确评价术后桥血管通畅情况。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts using 64 multi-slice computed tomography angiography (64-MSCTA) technology. Methods There were 228 patients post coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) underwent 64-MSCTA from July 2005 to April 2007. Thirty-one patients with 82 bypass grafts performed coronary angiography (CAG) because of angina or grafts lesion showed by 64-MSCTA. Results All bypass grafts could be visualized by 64-MSCTA. Thirteen bypass graft occlusions and fourteen significant stenesis were detected by 64-MSCTA and confirmed by CAG. One venous grafts distal anastomosis was missed and another one was miss diagnosed as stenesis. One false negative and one false positive CT-finding resulted in a sensitivity of 93.3%, a specificity of 98. 1%, a positive predictive value of 93. 3%, a negative predictive value of 98. 1% and an accuracy of 97. 1% for grafts stenesis. As to the grafts lesion, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for grafts occlusion were 96.4%, 98. 1%, 96.4% , 98. 1% and 97. 6%, respectively. Conclusion 64-MSCTA demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of graft patency and suitable for the follow-up of patients post CABG.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第4期245-247,共3页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
基金 军队医学杰出中青年科研基金资助项目(04J017)
关键词 体层摄影术 螺旋计算机 心血管造影术 冠状动脉分流术 Tomography, spinal computed Angiocardiography Coronary artery bypass
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology : first experience. Eur Heart J, 2005,26 : 1482-1487.
  • 2Kuettner A,Kopp AF, Schroeder S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with angiographicaUy proven coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,43 : 831-839.
  • 3Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach A J, et al. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome : angiographie follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996,28:616-626.
  • 4Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, et al. Noninvasive, threedimensional visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts by electron beam tomography. Am J Cardiol, 1997,79:856-861.
  • 5Marano R, Storto ML, Maddestra N, et al. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated fourrow multi-detector spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol,2004, 14:1353-1362.
  • 6Schlosser T,Konorza T, Hunold P, et al. Nonlnvasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol,2004 ,44 :1224-1229.
  • 7de Feyter PJ, Nieman K. Noninvasive multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography:an emerging clinical modality. J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,44 : 1238-1240.
  • 8Lepor NE, Madyoon H, Friede G, et al. The emerging using of 16-and 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in clinical cardiovascular practice. Rev Cardiovasc Med ,2005,6:47-53.
  • 9Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D' Eliseo A, et al. Evaluation of venous and arterial conduit patency by 16-slico spiral computed tomography. Circulation,2004,110 : 3234 -3238.
  • 10Chiurlia E, Menozzi M, Ratti C, et al. Follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol,2005,95 : 1094 -1097.

同被引文献25

  • 1李鹏雨,李坤成,杜祥颖,刘佳宾,曹丽珍,杨延辉.64层螺旋CT在冠状动脉搭桥术后随访中的初步应用[J].放射学实践,2007,22(4):376-379. 被引量:6
  • 2Sellke FW, DiMaio JM, Caplan LR, et al. Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: numerous studies but few conclusions: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia in collaboration with the interdisciplinary working group on quality of care and outcomes research. Circulation, 2005, 111 (21 ): 2858-2864.
  • 3Hannah EL, Chuntao WU, Smith CR, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: differences in short-term outcomes and in long-term mortality and need for subsequent revascu- larization. Circulation, 2007, 116 ( 10 ) : 1145-1152.
  • 4Karolak W, Hirseh G, Buth K, et al. Medium-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on pump versus offpump: results from a randomized controlled trial. Am Heart J, 2007, 153 (4): 689-695.
  • 5Raja SG, Dreyfus GD. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: to do or not to do ? Current best available evidence. J Cardiothorae Vase Anesth. 2004. 18(4): 486-505.
  • 6Meyer TS, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, et al. Improved noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with 64-slice computed tomographic angiography in an unselected patient population. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2007, 49(9): 946-950.
  • 7Lytle BW, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM, et al. Long-term (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1985, 89 (2) : 248-258.
  • 8Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, et al. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med, 2004,350(1): 21-28.
  • 9Al-Ruzzeh S, George S, Bustami M, et al. The early clinical andangiographic outcome of sequential coronary artery bypass grafting with the off-pump technique. J Thorae Cardiovasc Surg, 2002, 123 (3): 525-530.
  • 10Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, et al. Off-pump vs conven- tional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial. JAMA, 2004, 291 (15): 1841-1849.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部