期刊文献+

试析美国伊斯兰研究中的“犹太因素” 被引量:2

Analysis on the Jewish Elements in Islamic Studies of United States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当今美国的伊斯兰研究界活跃着一些犹太裔学者,他们以自己的观点和主张影响着美国对伊斯兰世界的看法,甚而影响到美国政府针对伊斯兰世界的政策制定。本文选择其中影响最大的几位学者,对其观点与主张加以简要介绍和分析,以求为理解当前西方和伊斯兰世界的关系提供新的视角。 Either the inter-religion dialogues or conflicts between religions are never simply determined by theologies or doctrines of religion. In fact, American policy for Islamic world these years is one of the most important elements which influence the relationship between Christiandom and Islamic world. In today's America, the most active and influential figures in Islamic and Middle East studies are some Jewish scholars and policy entrepreneurs. The analysis of their idea and opinion will show an other perspective in understanding relationship between west world and Islamic world.
作者 王宇洁
出处 《阿拉伯世界研究》 CSSCI 2008年第1期10-17,共8页 Arab World Studies
关键词 美国 伊斯兰研究 犹太因素 United States Islamic Studies Jewish Elements
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献37

  • 1Augustus Richard Norton. ed. . Civil Society in the Middle East 1 & 2 (Leiden. Netherlands: E. J.Brill. 1995).
  • 2John O. Volland & John L. Esposito. "Islam's Democratic Essence." Middle East Quarterly.Vol. 1. No. 3(September 1994)at http://www. meforum. org/article/151.
  • 3Martin Kramer. Ivory Towers on Sand: The Failure of Middle Eastern Studies in America(Washington: Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 2001). p. 2.
  • 4Martin Kramer and Lisa Anderson. "Middle Eastern Studies: What Went Wrong? Special Policy Forum Report." Policywatch. December 16. 2002 at http://www. campus-watch.org/article/id/406.
  • 5F. Gregory Gause Ill. "Who Lost Middle Eastern Studies?" Foreign Affairs. March/April2002. at http://www.foreignaffairs. org/20020301fareviewessay7979/f-gregory-gause-iii/wholost-middle-eastern-studies. html.
  • 6Martin Kramer. Ivory Towers on Sand : The Failure of Middle Eastern Studies in America(Washington: Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 2001).p. 37.
  • 7Stanley Kurtz. "Edward Said. Imperiafist : the Hegemonic Impulse of Post-colonialism."Weekly Standard. Vol. vii. No. 4. (Oct. 8. 2001). at http://www. travelbrochuregraphics.com/extra/edward Said_.imperialist. htm.
  • 8Norvell B. De Atkine and Daniel Pipes. "Middle Eastern Studies: What Went Wrong?" Academic Questions. Winter 1995 - 1996. at http://www.meforum. org/article/pipes/392.
  • 9F. Gregory Gause III. "Who Lost Middle Eastern Studies?" Foreign Affairs. March/April2002.
  • 10Martin Kramer. "Congress Probes Middle Eastern Studies." Martin Kramer. org. June 23.2003. at http://www.martinkramer.org/pages/899529/.

共引文献6

同被引文献39

  • 1何增科.市民社会概念的历史演变[J].中国社会科学,1994(5):67-81. 被引量:267
  • 2刘中民.中东民族主义与伊斯兰教关系评析[J].阿拉伯世界研究,2007(3):11-17. 被引量:3
  • 3John L. Esposito, ed., Islamand Developmet, New York, Syracuse University Press, 1980.
  • 4John L. Esposito, Islam and Politics , New York, Syracuse University Press, 1984.
  • 5John L. Esposito, The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality? Oxford University Press, 1995.
  • 6Bernard Lewis, "Religions and the Meeting of Civilizations", Atlantic Monthly, May 2003, Vol. 291, Issue 4.
  • 7Bernat Lewis, What Went Wrong? , Oxford University, 2002, pp. 150-160.
  • 8[美国]刘易斯.《穆斯林愤怒的根源》[J].大西洋月刊,1990,.
  • 9[美国]刘易斯.《穆斯林愤怒的根源》,转引自约翰·埃斯波托.《伊斯兰威胁;神话还是现实?》,社科文献出版社1999年版,第259页.
  • 10Edward Glaeser, "The Political Economy of Hatred", The Quarterly Journal of Economic, Vol. 120, Issue 1, Feb. 2005.

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部