期刊文献+

考虑声誉激励的供应链合作伙伴演化博弈模型 被引量:5

An Evolutionary Game Model for Supply Chain Partnerships System Based Reputation Incentive
原文传递
导出
摘要 在考虑企业声誉激励的前提下.运用间接演化方法,提出了供应链合作伙伴(Supply Chain Partnerships,SCP)系统中企业合作偏好度的演化博弈(Evolutionary Game)模型,分析了SCP系统的内在演化机制,研究了仅与产量相关以及与产量和企业合作偏好度都相关的企业声誉激励机制对SCP系统企业合作偏好度演化稳定的影响,得到了相关的结论. The process to form SCP system is an evolutionary game among the enterprise-agents. And it is dynamic process of enterprise-agents strategy behavior. Therefore, based reputation incentive, it brings forward the indirect evolution model of cooperation inclination degree among the enterprise-agents of SCP system. And it presents series of conclusion about SCP system cooperation inclination degree evolutionary stable. It will have important practice value to improve decision-making dynamic adapt ability of SCP system and implement efficiency control policy.
出处 《数学的实践与认识》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第4期58-63,共6页 Mathematics in Practice and Theory
关键词 供应链合作伙伴 演化博弈 演化稳定策略 间接演化 声誉 supply chain partnerships evolutionary game evolutionary stable strategy indirect evolution reputation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Fiala P. Information sharing in supply chain[J]. Omega, 2005,33 (5) : 419-423.
  • 2Hongwei Wang, Min Guo, Janet Efstathiou. A game-theoretical cooperative mechanism design for a two-echelon decentralized supply chain[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004,157(2) :372-388.
  • 3Eriksson A, Lindgren K. Cooperation driven by mutations in multi-person Prisoner's Dilemma[J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2005,232 : 399-409.
  • 4吴昊,杨梅英,陈良猷.合作竞争博弈中的复杂性与演化均衡的稳定性分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(2):90-94. 被引量:78
  • 5石岿然,肖条军.双寡头零售市场的演化稳定策略[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(12):24-28. 被引量:18
  • 6Barcena-Ruiz J C, Espinosa M P. Should multi-product firms provide divisional or corporate incentives? [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1999, (17) :751-764.

二级参考文献12

  • 1吴昊 杨梅英 陈良猷 等.超竞争环境中企业合作竞争的基本机理与模型研究[R]..超竞争环境下企业合作竞争的模式研究报告之二[C].,2002..
  • 2Jagmohan S, Raju V, Rajiv L.The effects of brand loyalty on competitive price promotional strategies[J].Management Science, 1990, 36(3): 276-304.
  • 3Bester H, Petrakis E.Coupons and oligopolistic price discrimination[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1996, 14(2): 227-242.
  • 4Peter J, Erica J, Kathy A.High-low pricing: Audit evidence and consumer preferences[J].Journal of Brand Product and Brand Management, 2000, 9(5): 316-324.
  • 5Stephen J, Xavier D, Mary E.EDLP, Hi-Lo, and margin arithmetic[J].Journal of Marketing, 1994, 58(4):16-27.
  • 6Gail T, Susan R.Everyday low price or sale price[J].The Journal of Psychology, 1997, 131(4): 401-406.
  • 7Rajiv L, Rao R.Supermarket competition: The case of everyday low price[J].Marketing Science, 1997, 16(1): 60-80.
  • 8Teck-Hua H, Christopher S, Bell D.Rational shopping behavior and the option value of variable pricing[J].Management Science, 1998, 44(12): 145-160.
  • 9Santore R.Pricing differentiated products with indifferent consumers[J].Economics Letters, 1999, 62(1): 43-52.
  • 10Webull J.Evolutionary Game Theory[M].Princeton Press, 1995.

共引文献92

同被引文献84

引证文献5

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部