期刊文献+

种子大小对小泡巨鼠贮藏行为的影响 被引量:17

Effect of seed size on hoarding behavior of Edward’s long-tailed rats (Leopoldamys edwardsi)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以小泡巨鼠为研究对象,在围栏条件下,测定小泡巨鼠对大小两种栓皮栎种子的贮藏行为差异,以检验最优贮藏空间模型的两个预测:(1)大种子(高价值食物)的贮藏率大于小种子(低价值食物);(2)大种子的贮藏距离远于小种子。结果表明:大种子的搬运比例(39%)多于小种子(21.5%),多数的小种子(53%)被取食,大种子的贮藏比率(16%)远大于小种子(7%),上述结果支持模型的预测(1)。但是,不同大小种子在贮藏距离上没有显著差异,因而预测(2)没有被支持。实验结果表明种子价值对鼠类的取食和贮藏行为有十分重要的影响,但围栏空间可能影响对模型预测(2)的检验。 We used Edward's long-tailed rats ( Leopoldamys edwardsi ) and Cork oak ( Quercus varialilis ) seeds with different seed size, a dominant granivore and tree species in the experimental forest of Dujiangyan City, Sichuan Province, to test the two predictions of the Optimal Cache Spacing Model in a semi-natural enclosure : ( 1 ) The caching proportion of big seeds ( high value) should be higher than that of small ones ( low value) ; and ( 2 ) the big seeds will be cached at a longer distance from their source sites than will the small ones. The experimental results supported prediction ( 1 ) : the removal proportion of big seeds ( 39% ) was higher than that of small ones ( 21.5% ) , and the caching proportion of big ones ( 16% } was also higher than that of small ones (7%). But, there were little difference between big seeds and small ones in dispersal distance of cached seeds, so prediction (2) was not supported. Our results suggested that seed value had significant effect on hoarding behavior of rodents, but enclosure effect might prevent falsifying the prediction ( 2 ).
出处 《兽类学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第1期37-41,共5页 Acta Theriologica Sinica
基金 国家科学基金资助项目(30430130,30500072和30570307) 中国科学院海外合作团队创新项目(CXTDS2005-4)
关键词 贮藏行为 最优贮藏空间模型 种子价值 种子大小 Hoarding behavior Optimal Cache Spacing Model Seed value Seed size
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献24

  • 1肖治术,张知彬,王玉山.啮齿动物鉴别虫蛀种子的能力及其对坚果植物更新的潜在影响(英文)[J].兽类学报,2003,23(4):312-321. 被引量:26
  • 2Price M V, Jenkins S H. Rodents as seed consumers and dispersers[A]. In: Murray D Red. Seed Dispersal [C]. Sydney Australia:Academic Press, 1986.191 - 235.
  • 3Vander Wall S B. Food Hoarding in Animals [M]. Chicago: Univ.Chicago Press, 1990.
  • 4Jansen P A, Forget P M. Scatter-hoarding rodents and tree regeneration [A] . In: Bongers F, Charles-Dominique P, Forget P- M,Théry M eds. Dynamics and Plant-Animal Interactions in a Neotropical Rainforest [C]. Nouragues: Kluwer Academic Pubhsher, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2001. 275- 288.
  • 5Vander Wall S B. A model of caching depth: Implication for scatter hoarders and plant dispersal [J]. Am Nat, 1993, 141: 217-232.
  • 6Smith C C.Reidunan O J.The evolution of food caching by birds and mammals[J].Ann Rev Ecol Syst,1984,15:329—351.
  • 7Smith C C,Follmer D.Food preferences of squirrels[J].Ecology,1972,53:82—91.
  • 8Lewis A R.Selection of nuts by gray squirrels and optimal foraging theory[J].Am Midl Nat,1982,107:250—257.
  • 9Smallwood P D,Peters W D.Grey squirrel food preferences:The effects of tannin and fat concentration[J].Ecology,1986,67:168-174.
  • 10Pyare S,Kent JA,Noxon DL,Murphy M T.Acom preference and habitat use in eastern chipmunks[J].Am Midl Nat,1993,130:173—183.

共引文献114

同被引文献146

引证文献17

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部