期刊文献+

急性心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗疗效与预后的影响因素 被引量:6

Factors influencing outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究接受直接PCI治疗的ST段抬高AMI患者中,PCI术后即刻TIMI血流分级、心电图ST段的回落、心肌酶峰值、LVEF以及随访期间不良事件发生情况的影响因素,特别是评价症状发作至球囊打开时间(symptom-onset-to-balloon time,SOTB)以及接诊至球囊打开时间(door-to-bal-loon time,DTB)与上述指标的关系。方法入选2001年1月至2006年4月因ST段抬高AMI收入北京大学第一医院、接受了直接PCI,且已随访半年以上的患者120例,随访时间5.0~65.4个月,中位随访时间20.1个月,收集包括疾病史、吸烟史、体重指数、入院时Killip分级等基线资料,记录SOTB时间,DTB时间、冠状动脉病变情况、合并用药情况、术后TIMI血流分级、心电图ST段的回落、术后心肌酶峰值、LVEF,记录随访期间不良事件。采用多因素Logistic回归分析,评价上述指标对疗效及预后的影响。结果(1)SOTB是影响PCI术后即刻TIMI血流分级的独立的危险因素:与SOTB大于360min的患者相比,SOTB小于360min的患者发生无血流/慢血流的危险明显降低(OR=0.2,95%CI:0.0~1.0,P=0.045);(2)肥胖是影响术后心肌酶峰值的独立的危险因素(β=117.3,95%CI:12.1~222.6,P=0.029);(3)高龄、肥胖、术前Killip分级是影响术后LVEF的独立危险因素,其中高龄(β=-6,95%CI:-9.7~-2.2,P=0.002)、肥胖(β=-3.8,95%CI:-7.6~-0.1,P=0.044)与低的LVEF显著相关,而术前Killip分级Ⅰ级与高的LVEF显著相关(β=4.9,95%CI:0.4~9.4,P=0.033);(4)术前Killip分级与多支血管病变是随访期间不良事件发生的独立的预测因素:与KillipⅡ级以上患者相比,KillipⅠ级患者随访期间不良事件发生风险明显降低(OR=0.1,95%CI:0.0~0.7,P=0.022);而与单支病变患者相比,多支血管病变随访期间不良事件发生明显增加(OR=10.5,95%CI:1.1~99.4,P=0.041)。结论多种因素可以影响接受直接PCI的AMI患者临床疗效及预后,包括高龄、肥胖、多支血管病变、术前心功能,而SOTB和AMI患者PCI术后TIMI血流分级显著相关。 Objective To identify the factors which could influence the clinical outcomes including postprocedural TIMI flow, ST-segment recovery, peak concentration of CK-MB, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by echocardiography and the incidence of major adverse cardiac event in patients with AMI receiving primary PCI. Time issues including the symptom-onset-to-balloon time (SOTB) and the door-to- balloon time (DTB) were also studied. Methods One hundred and twenty patients hospitalized in Peking University First Hospital with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction between Jan. 2001 to Apr. 2006 were enrolled in this study. The median duration of the follow up was 20. 1 months ( ranged from 5 to 65.4 months after the procedure). The preprocedural Killip classification, history of underlying diseases, BMI, history of smoking, SOTB, DTB, lesions angiographic characteristics the treatment protocol and the clinical outcomes of all patients were documented. The influential factors for respective clinical outcomes were identified using multivariate logistic regression test. Results (1) SOTB was identified as an independent risk factor for pestproeedural TIMI flow. Compared with that of patients with SOTB 〉 360 min, the risk of no-reflow phenomenon was decreased in patients with SOTB ≤ 360 rain (OR = 0. 2,95 % CI:0.0- 1.0,P =0. 045). (2) Obesity was identified as an independent risk factor for peak concentration of CK- MB (β= 117.3,95% CI:12.1 -222.6,P =0.029). (3) Age (above 60 years old), obesity, and preprocedural Killip classification were identified as independent risk factors for postprocedural LVEF. Old age (β = - 6,95 % CI: - 9.7 - - 2. 2, P = 0. 002) and obesity ( β = - 3.8,95 % CI: - 7.6 - - O. 1, P = 0. 044) were associated with low LVEF but preprocedural cardiac function of Killip Class I was associated with high LVEF ( β = 4. 9,95% CI: 0. 4 - 9. 4, P = 0. 033 ). (4) Preprocedural Killip classification and multivessel disease were independent predictors for major adverse cardiac event in the follow-up period. The risk of major adverse cardiac event during follow-up decreased in patients with preprocedural Killip class I compared with patients with Killip class Ⅱ~Ⅳ (OR =0. 1,95% CI:0. 0 -0. 7, P =0. 022), but the risk increased in patients with multivessel disease compared with those who had single vessel disease (OR = 10. 5, 95% CI: 1.1 - 99.4, P = 0. 041 ). Conclusion The clinical outcomes and prognosis of patients with AMI treated with primary PCI were associated with a variety of risk factors including age, obesity, multivessel disease, and preprocedural cardiac function. In addition, SOTB was related to postprocedural TIMI flow in patients with AMI undergoing primary PCI.
出处 《中国介入心脏病学杂志》 2008年第1期8-11,共4页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
关键词 心肌梗死 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 预后 因素分析 统计学 Myocardial infarction Angioplasty, transluminal, percutaneous coronary Prognosis Factor analysis, statistical
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1McLellan CS, Le May MR, Labinaz M. Current reperfusion strategies for ST elevation myocardial infarction: a Canadian perspective. Can J Cardiol,2004,20:525-533.
  • 2Widimsky P, Groch L, Zelizko M, et al. Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE study. Eur Heart J, 2000, 21:823-831.
  • 3Pinto DS, Southard M, Ciaglo L, et al. Door-to-balloon delays with percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J, 2006,151(6 Suppl) :S24-29.
  • 4Brodie BR, Stuckey TD, Wall TC, et al. Importance of time to reperfusion for 30-day and late survival and recovery of left ventricular function after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998,32:1312-1319.
  • 5De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Zijlstra F, et al. Symptom-onset-to- balloon time and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003,42:991-997.
  • 6Berger PB, Ellis SG, Holmes DR Jr, et al. Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the global use of strategies to open occluded arteries in acute coronary syndromes (GUSTO-IIb) trial. Circulation, 1999,100 : 14- 20.
  • 7Cannon CP, Gibson CM, Lambrew CT, et al. Relationship of symptom-onset- to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. JAMA, 2000,283:2941-2947.
  • 8杨新春,郭军,王乐丰,程祖亨,葛永贵,王红石,邹阳春,佟子川,李惟铭,徐立.急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗冠状动脉造影无复流的相关因素[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2004,12(2):83-86. 被引量:54

二级参考文献1

  • 1杨新春 王乐丰 佟子川 等.急性心肌梗死症状发作-首次球囊扩张时间和症状发作--进入导管室时间与左心室射血分数和肌酸激酶MB同工酶的关系[J].中国循环杂志,2002,17:77-77.

共引文献53

同被引文献36

  • 1陈纪林.急性心肌梗死的溶栓治疗[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(1):69-70. 被引量:25
  • 2罗义,吕磊,李广镰,皮耀球,曾冲,潘宜智,雷晓明,刘震.急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入术心肌缺血再灌注损伤的发病因素分析[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(8):691-694. 被引量:17
  • 3于丽天,朱俊,Rebecca Mister,章晏,李建冬,王多劳,刘力生,Marcus Flather.我国部分医院ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征再灌注治疗登记研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(7):593-597. 被引量:30
  • 4Keeley EG,Boura JA,Grines CL.Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction:a quantitivative review of 23 randomised trials.Lancet,2003,261:13-20.
  • 5Kruk M,Buller CE,Tcheng JE,et al.Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on clinical outcomes over five years after infarctrelated coronary artery recanalization (from the occluded artery trial[OAT]).Am J Cardiol,2010,105:10-16.
  • 6Ndrepepa G,Mehilli J,Martinoff S,et al.Evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction and its relationship to infarct size after acute myocardial infarction.J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,50:149-156.
  • 7Guagliumi G,Stone GW,Cox DA,et al.Prediction of one-year mortality among 30-day survivors after primary coronary interventions.Am J Cardiol,2006,97:817-822.
  • 8Dutcher JR,Kahn J,Grines C,et al.Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and exercise capacity as predictors of two-and five-year mortality following acute myocardial infarction.Am J Cardiol,2007,99:436-441.
  • 9Mehta RH,Rathore SS,Radford MJ,et al.Acute myocardial infarction in the elderly:difference by age.J Am Coll Cardiol,2001,38:736-41.
  • 10Brodie BR,Stuckey TD,Wall TC,et al.Importance of time to reperfusion for 30 days and late survival and recovery of left ventricular function after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.J Am Coll Cardiol,1998,38:1312-1319.

引证文献6

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部