期刊文献+

远端保护装置用于重度颈动脉狭窄的介入治疗 被引量:1

Application of cerebral protection filter in stenting of severe carotid stenosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析远端保护装置应用于颈动脉狭窄支架成形术的安全性和有效性。方法对26例症状性颈动脉狭窄患者行血管内支架成形术时应用远端保护装置,首先将远端保护装置通过狭窄部位并在狭窄远端展开,然后行保护性颈动脉支架成形术,观察围手术期缺血性脑卒中的发生情况,并观察保护装置滤网内捕获的斑块组织碎片。结果26例患者行远端滤网保护下的颈动脉支架成形术均获成功,回收的保护装置中有14个(54%)发现滤网中有斑块碎片组织和血栓颗粒,无死亡及急性栓塞事件发生,但有3例患者在手术后1~6d经磁共振检查发现了新的无症状性脑梗死病灶,26例患者在出院后临床随访期内未发生严重脑缺血事件。结论颈动脉支架成形术是重度症状性颈动脉狭窄的微创治疗方法,术中常规使用远端保护装置可提高颈动脉支架成形术的安全性和有效性。 Objective To analyze the effect and safety of cerebral protection filter in carotid artery and stenting (CAS) for the treatment of severe symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Methods Elective CAS with the use of cerebral protection filters were undergone in 26 consecutive patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. The filter devices were advanced through lesions and opened distal to the lesions followed by CAS. The incidence of cerebral ischemic events and the debris collected in the filters were observed and analyzed. Results In all the patients, it was feasible and successful to position the filters devices in the internal carotid artery. After the filter devices were positioned, CAS were performed successfully in all the 26 patients. Thrombus or plague debris were found in 14 out of 26 retrieved filters (54%). There was no death or symptomatic cerebral thromboembolic event during the CAS procedure. Asymptomatic cerebral embolization lesions were detected in 3 patients by the means of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after 1 -6 days of the CAS. No major cerebral or cardiovascular ischemic events were recorded in all patients during their follow up period of 6 - 12 months. Conclusion Carotid artery stenting is an effective microinvasive therapy for severe carotid artery stenosis which effect and safety can be enhanced with the use of cerebral protection filter.
出处 《中国介入心脏病学杂志》 2008年第1期31-34,共4页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
基金 江苏省科技厅和卫生厅联合招标项目(BS2003003)
关键词 颈动脉狭窄 脑血管意外 支架 滤网保护装置 Carotid stenosis Ischemic Cerebrovascular acciden Stents Cerebral protection filter
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1van Heesewijk HP, Vos JA, Louwerse ES, et al. Carotid PTA and Stenting Collaborative Research Group. New brain lesions at MR imaging after carotid angioplasty and stent placement. Radiology, 2002, 224 : 361-365.
  • 2Zahn R, Mark B, Niedermaier N, et al. Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: better results than stenting without protection? Eur Heart J, 2004, 25: 1550-1558.
  • 3Wholey MH, Al Mubarek N, Wholey MH. Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv, 2003, 60: 259-266.
  • 4Kastrup A, Groschel K, Krapf H, et al. Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke, 2003, 34: 813-819.
  • 5Zarins CK. Carotid endarterectomy: the gold standard. J Endovasc Surg, 1996, 3:10 -15.
  • 6White C J, Iyer SS, Hopkins LN, et al. Carotid stenting with distal protection in high surgical risk patients: the BEACH trial 30 day results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2006, 67 : 503-512.
  • 7Bosiers M, Peeters P, Deloose K, et al. Does carotid artery stenting work on the long run: 5-year results in high-volume centers (ELOCAS Registry). J Cardiovasc Surg, 2005, 46: 241- 247.
  • 8Brook WH, McClure RR, Jones MR, et al. Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a randomized trial in a community hospital. Neurosurgery, 2004, 54: 318-325.
  • 9Al-Mubarak N, Roubin GS, Vitek J J, et al. Effect of the distalballoon protection system on microembolization during carotid stenting. Circulation, 2001, 104: 1999-2002.
  • 10Cremonesi A, Manetti R, Castriota F, et al. Protected carotid stenting: clinical advantages and complications of embolic protection devices in 442 consecutive patients. Stroke, 2003, 34: 1936-1943.

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部