期刊文献+

论优选论的功能主义倾向 被引量:12

On the functionalist tendency in OT
原文传递
导出
摘要 优选论的近期研究呈现功能主义倾向,其主要表现就是把标记类制约条件和忠实类制约条件建立在语音的生理、物理、感知和功能原则基础之上。对于形式理论来说,制约条件的功能化带来一系列严重的理论后果:音系语法不再是语言知识而是行为知识;音系失去语法本体地位;制约条件源于开放的物质世界,因此在数量上是无限的;制约条件具有经验基础,因此不必是先天的。导致这些理论后果的根本原因是优选论缺少符合形式理论要求的语法构建原则。 One of the latest developments in OT displays a conspicuous functionalist tendency towards constructing constraints of both markedness and faithfulness on the basis of functional principles, manifesting itself in various versions in seeking for phonological explanations on the phy ̄siological, acoustic and perceptual grounds. This move brings about some theoretical consequences: (1) the functionalized constraints undermine the ontology of phonology as part of formal grammar and render it part of the knowledge of behavior; (2) as constraints come from an open world of physics, the constraint set is potentially non-finite; and (3) experience-based constraints create a number of problems for phonological acquisition. Such a functionalist ten ̄dency is shown to be originated from the deviation from the principles for grammar construction well-established in classical generative phonology.
作者 李兵
出处 《当代语言学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第1期1-19,共19页 Contemporary Linguistics
关键词 优选论 功能主义 生理 物理 感知 行为 OT, functionalist tendency, theoretical consequences
  • 相关文献

参考文献97

  • 1Anderson, S.R. 1974. The Organization of Phonology, New York: Seminar Press. .
  • 2Anderson, S.R.1981.Why phonology isn't “natural”. Linguistic Inquiry 12:493-539.
  • 3Anttila, A. and Y.Y. Cho. 2004. Variation and change in Optimality Theory. In J. McCarthy, ed. , Opti mality Theory in Phonology. Oxford: Blaekwell. Pp. 569 - 80.
  • 4Archangeli,D. 1988, Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 5 : 183 -207.
  • 5Archangeli,D.1997 Optimality Theory: An introduction to linguistics. In D. Archangeli and D.T. Langendoen,eds. , Optimality Theory: An Overview. Oxford: Blackwell. Pp. 1-32.
  • 6Beckman, J. 1998. Positional Faithfulness, Ph. D. diss. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
  • 7Blevins J. 2004. Evoluttonary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Boersma,P.1998. Functional Phonology: Formalizing the Interaction between Articulatory and Perceptual Drives. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics,
  • 9Boersma,P.2000. Learning a grammar in functional phonology. In J. Dekkers, F.van der Leeuw and J. van de Weijer,eds, Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax, and Acquisition; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 10Boersma,P.2003.The odds of external optimization in Optimality Theory..In D.E. Holt, ed. Optimality Theory and Language Change. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Pp. 31 - 66.

二级参考文献34

  • 1左岩.优选论的最新进展之一──共感理论[J].现代外语,1999,22(3):310-326. 被引量:19
  • 2Benua,L. 1995. Identity effects in morphological truncation [A]. In J. Beckman, L. Walsh & S. Urbanczyk (eds.). Papers in Optimality Theory. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18 [C]. Amherst, Mass.: Graduate Linguistic Student Association. pp. 77-136.
  • 3Blumenfeld, L. 2003. Counterfeeding, derived environment effects and comparative markedness [J]. Theoretical Linguistics 29: 89-99.
  • 4Booij, G. 1997. Non-derivational phonology meets Lexical Phonology [A]. In I. Roca (ed.). Derivations and Constraints in Phonology [C]. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • 5Bradshaw, M. 1999. Unrecoverable origins [A]. In B.Hermans & M. V. Oostendorp (eds). The Derivational Residue in Phonological Optimality Theory [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 6Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structure [M]. The Hague: Mouton.
  • 7Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use [M]. New York: Praeger.
  • 8Chomsky, N. 1994. Bare phrase structure [R]. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5.
  • 9Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program [M].Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
  • 10Chomsky, N. & M. Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English [M]. New York: Harper & Row.

共引文献14

同被引文献226

引证文献12

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部