期刊文献+

Dyract flow流动复合体用于预防性树脂充填的疗效观察 被引量:1

Effect of Dyract flow compomer for preventive resin restoration therapy:a clinical observation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察Dyract flow流动复合体用于预防性树脂充填(PRR)的临床疗效。方法试验组应用Dyract flow流动复合体充填年轻恒牙窝沟龋损并封闭其余窝沟;对照组应用光固化复合树脂充填龋洞,其余窝沟用窝沟封闭剂封闭。结果试验组治疗后6个月和1年的封闭剂完全保留率分别为100.0%和94.8%,对照组分别为95.5%和87.7%,两组问差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05);2年后,试验组和对照组的封闭剂完全保留率分别为88.3%和77.2%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组和对照组在6个月、1年时的龋病发生率均为0;2年后试验组为0,对照组为1.98%;两组间的差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。结论Dyract flow流动复合体足一种良好的PRR材料,在PRR治疗中可作为传统充填方法的补充,值得推广应用。 Objective To observe the clinical effect of Dyract flow compomer for preventive resin restoration (PRR) therapy. Methods Eighty children (aged 6-10 years) with occlusal pit-and-fissure caries involving the bilateral first permanent molars were enrolled in this study. In each patient, the caries in the molar on one side was filled and the other pits were sealed with Dyract flow compomer (test group), while the contralateral molar was repaired using photosensitized resin with the other pits sealed with routine sealants. The patients were followed up for 2 years to observe the therapeutic effects of the treatments. Results The sealant retention rates in the test group 6 months and 1 year after caries filling were 100% and 94.8%, respectively, similar to the rates in the control group (95.5% and 87.7%, P 〉 0.05) ; two years after the filling, the retention rates in the test and control groups were 88.3% and 77.2%, respectively (P〈 0.05). The dental caries prevalence rates in half an year, 1 year, and 2 years were all 0 in the test group, showing no significant difference compared with the rates in the control group (0, 0, and 1.98%, respectively, P 〉 0.05). Conclusion Dyract flow compomer is effective for preventive resin restoration therapy and offers an alternative for the conventional filling materials for caries repair. (Shanghai Med J, 2007, 30:911-913)
出处 《上海医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第12期911-913,共3页 Shanghai Medical Journal
关键词 DYRACT flow流动复合体 预防性树脂充填 年轻恒牙 Dyract flow compomer preventive resin restoration Young permanent tooth
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献1

共引文献34

同被引文献24

  • 1谢富强.预防性Dyractflow流动复合体充填窝沟龋的临床效果[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2005,21(3):409-411. 被引量:5
  • 2徐美玉.Dyract flow流动复合体与光固化窝沟封闭剂治疗磨牙窝沟龋的临床比较[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2006,22(4):562-563. 被引量:5
  • 3Simonsen RJ. Stallard RE. Sealant-restorations utilizing a diluted filled resin:One year results[J]. Quintessence Int. 1977, 8(6): 77.
  • 4Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D. Assessing the quality of reports ofrandomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary[J]. Control Clinic Trials, 1996,17(1): 1-12.
  • 5王忠, 周莹. 不同预防性充填材料临床效果分析[J]. 健康必读,2012,11(10):208-209.
  • 6Jafarzadeh M, Malekafzali B, Tadayon N, et al. Retention of a FlowableComposite Resin in Comparison to a Conventional Resin-Based Sealant:One-year Follow-up[J].Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of MedicalSciences,2010, 7(1): 1-5.
  • 7Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Gareia L, et al. Randimized, controlled trialcomparing the retention of a flowable restorative systerm with a conventionalresin sealant: one-year follow up[J]. Int J Paediatr Dent,2005,15(1): 44-50.
  • 8Oba AA, Sonmez IS, Ercan E, et al. Comparison of retention rates of fissuresealants using two flowable restoration materials and conventional resin sealant:two-year follow-up[J]. Med Princ Prut, 2012, 21(3): 234-237.
  • 9Rabello T. Research proposal: evaluation of the ART approach in elderlypatients[J]. J Appl Oral Sci,2006,14(spe): 30-33.
  • 10Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports ofmeta-analyses of randomized controlled trials the QUOROM statement Qualityreporting of meta-analyses[J].Lancet,1999,354(9193):1896-1900.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部