摘要
我国理论界对刑事和解的界定具有典型的"泛西方化"色彩,既不能反映我国的司法实践,也不能揭示刑事和解在我国适用的立法化方向。刑事和解与罪刑法定原则的价值取向、契约精神和内在要求在根本上是一致的;刑事诉讼法第一百四十二条第二款是检察机关适用刑事和解的法律基础和范围。以判处"三年以下有期徒刑、拘役、管制"的案件为标准确定适用刑事和解的范围,不仅可以节约司法成本,提高诉讼效益,而且可以实现政治效果、法律效果与社会效果三者的和谐统一。
Our theoretical circles define criminal reconciliation with typical "pan-Western" color, which can neither reflect China's judicial practice nor reveal criminal reconciliation in the direction of the applicable Chinese legislation. ‘Criminal reconciliation metes out punishments according to the values, spirit and the inherent requirements of leases in the fundamental at the same time. The Code of Criminal Procedure 142, paragraph 2, formulates the scope of the criminal reconciliation that is applicable in legal practices. Criminal reconciliation can be applied to the cases of "three years imprisonment, detention, control", which can not only save costs and improve efficiency of the proceedings, but achieve a political effect, a legal effect and a social effect at the same time.
出处
《宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版)》
2007年第6期110-113,共4页
Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences:Social Science Edition
关键词
刑事和解
罪刑法定原则
检察机关
criminal reconciliation
lawful principle of crime and punishment
prosecuting organs