期刊文献+

我国目前高校本科教学评估指标的不足及其改进设想 被引量:6

The Shortcomings of the College Teaching Appraisal Indexes in Nowaday's China and some Suggestions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前我国本科教学评估引发了一系列争论,争论的根源在于各项指标设计的不合理。我国高校本科教学评估指标主要包括七个一级指标和19个二级指标,同时还有一个"特色"指标。以指标设计的SMART原则来考量,这些指标的S性、M性、R性和T性均显欠缺。我们可以通过增强指标的明确具体性,使得指标具有可测量性,使指标体现结果导向,为指标设置时限的办法来解决这些问题。 In nowaday's China, the assessment on the colleges and universities' teaching quality has caused a series of arguments, the root of which is that the assessing indexes are designed improperly. The assessing indexes used in China include 7 first-level indexes and 19 second-level indexes, and under each second-level index, the "observing points" are arranged. Judged by the SMART principle, the S-nature, S-nature, R-nature and T-nature of the indexes are all inadequate. In order to solve the problem, we could strengthen the specification, measurability, result-orientation and time-line. By these means, we can improve the assessing'work considerably.
作者 顾华锋
出处 《宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第6期119-123,共5页 Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences:Social Science Edition
关键词 本科教学评估 指标 SMART the assessment on the colleges and universities' teaching quality indexes SMART
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1[2]越.公共部门绩效评估概论[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2006.
  • 2[3]Harland G.Bloland.Creating the Council for High-er Education Accreditation[M].Ariz.:Oryx Press,2001.
  • 3[1]王选.谈科学研究的环境建设[N].科学时报,2005-11-26(2).

同被引文献42

引证文献6

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部