期刊文献+

基于行为决策理论的腐败行为分析及其治理 被引量:7

Corrupt Behavior and the Measures of Anticorruption——A Study Based on the Behavioral Decision Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对行为决策理论的腐败选择行为模型的分析和研究,我们发现,对于面对损失具有风险偏好倾向的腐败者,虽然位卑权小时廉洁守法,升职后却可能走向腐败。而且,一个弹性的惩罚制度环境会增加行为人的违规价值预期,强化行为人逃避严惩的侥幸心理,加剧腐败行为蔓延。所以,建立科学合理的用人机制,优化监督环境,提高惩罚制度的执行力,是遏制腐败蔓延的有效手段。 The article looks at the corruption preference behavior based on the model of Behavioral Decision Theory. It is found that the lower raking government officials, honest and law-abiding as they may be, are inclined to corrupt after promotion. It is also found that flexible and lenient penalty can result in the anticipation of high benefit and low risk of corruption, thus encouraging the fluke mindedness and giving rise to rampant corruption. It follows then that an effective mechanism to contain corruption should includeestablishing a scientific system of personnel, optimizing the regulatory function and enhancing the enforcement of penalty.
出处 《当代财经》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期7-12,共6页 Contemporary Finance and Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“和谐社会构建中地方政府政策执行力研究”(07BZZ018)
关键词 行为决策理论 腐败行为 腐败选择行为模型 风险偏好 惩罚制度 corruption and punishment, risk preference, Behavioral Decision Theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Buchanan et al.. Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking society[M]. College Station: Texas A & M Press, 1980.
  • 2Lui F.T.. A Dynamic Model of Corruption Deterrence [J]. Journal of Public Economics, Nov., 1986, (31): 215-236.
  • 3Sah Raaj K.. Large and Persistent Differences in Corruption Acrbss Countries and Regions [R]. Working paper, University of Chicago, January 16, 2005.
  • 4Tirole J.. A Theory of Collective Reputations with Applications to the Persistence of Corruption and to Finn Quality[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1996, 63 (1): 1-22.
  • 5Lais A. Sosa. Wages and Other Determinants of Corruption [J]. Review of Development Economics, 2004, 8(4): 597-605.
  • 6周军,刘民权.在不确定性条件下高薪养廉政策绩效分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2004,21(12):95-105. 被引量:18
  • 7Kahneman D., A. Tversky. A Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263-91.
  • 8Kahneman D., A. Tversky. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice[J]. Science, 1981, (211): 453-58.
  • 9A. Tversky Kahneman D.. Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions[J]. Journal of Business, 1986, 59, (4): 251-277.
  • 10Polinsky A. M., Steven S.. The Economic Theory of Public Enforcement of Law[R]. Discussion Paper No. 235, John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business, Harvard Law School, 1998.

二级参考文献63

  • 1孙学玉,周义程.当代公共行政改革模式及其比较[J].江苏行政学院学报,2004(4):83-89. 被引量:3
  • 2胡长和.从“效率工资”看高薪养廉问题[J].江西财经大学学报,1999(5):20-22. 被引量:6
  • 3景云祥.经营城市与执政为民[J].行政与法,2004(9):8-11. 被引量:2
  • 4陈平其.《对高薪养廉制度的实证分析》.《理论探讨》,2000,(6).
  • 5Shapiro, C. and J. E. Stiglitz, Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device,American Economic Review[J].1984, 74 (3), 433-444.
  • 6Akerlof, G. A. and J. L. Yellen, The Fair Wage-effort Hypothesis and Unemployment, The Quarterly Journal of Economics [J], 1990, Vol. CV, Issue 2, 255-283.
  • 7Arrow, K. L., Essays in the theory of risk bearing, Chicago, IL: Markham Publishing, 1971.
  • 8Bales, S., and M. Rarna, Are Public Sector Workers Underpaid? Appropriate Comparators in a Developing Country, World Bank working paper, 2002.
  • 9Banfield, E., Corruption as a Feature, of Governmental Organization, Journal of Law and Economics[J], 1975, XVIII, 587-605.
  • 10Becker, G. S. and G. J. Stigler, Law Enforcement, Malfeasance, and the Compensation of Enforcers, Journal of Legal Studies [J], 1974.

共引文献110

同被引文献160

引证文献7

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部