期刊文献+

英、汉语中的关系化都是移动的结果吗? 被引量:18

Is there movement in both Chinese and English relativization?
原文传递
导出
摘要 生成语法学界普遍认为,与英语中的关系化一样,汉语中的关系化也是移动的结果,留下wh-语迹或NP/DP-语迹。但本文总结了英、汉关系化在六个方面的区别来证明:与英语关系化不同,汉语关系化中没有移动,因此,与英语关系化的移动语迹(NP/DP-语迹或wh-语迹)表面对应的空缺只是空代词。这六个方面是:1)是否存在"重构效应";2)是否遵循邻近原则;3)是否存在"典型汉语关系结构";4)关系结构中的IP能否单独使用;5)是否允准粘宾动词搁浅;6)是否允准寄生语缺。 Following the movement analysis of English relativization (ER), generative studies all argue for a movement analysis of Chinese relativization (CR), but this paper argues for a movement analysis of ER but a non-movement analysis of CR, supported by a cluster of differences between ER and CR with regard to the following six aspects: 1) The (non-)existence of reconstruction effects, 2) the (non-)existence of island effects, 3) the (non-)existence of gapless Chinese relative structures, 4) the independent well-formedness or ill-formedness of the relative IP, 5) the (non-)existence of 'strong transitive stranding', and 6) the (non-)existence of parasitic gap. It is finally concluded that there is a wh-trace or NP/DP-trace in ER, but its Chinese counterpart is just an empty pronoun.
作者 杨彩梅
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第1期20-28,共9页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 天津市哲学社会科学规划研究项目(编号:TJYW07-2016)
  • 相关文献

参考文献49

  • 1Abney, S. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Senential Aspect [M]. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Presss.
  • 2Alexiadou, A., P. Law, A. Meinunger&C. Wilder. 2000. The Syntax of Relative Clauses [M]. Amsterdam.. John Benjamins.
  • 3Aoun, J. & A. Li. 2003. Essays on the Representational and Derivational Nature of Grammar : The Diversity of Wit-constructions [M]. Cambridge, MA. : The MIT Press.
  • 4Bianchi, V. 1999. Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses [M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 5Chiu, B. 1993. The Inflectional Structure of Mandarin Chinese [D]. Ph.D. Dissertation. Los Angeles: University of California.
  • 6Chomsky, N. 1977. On wh-movement [A]. In P. Culicover, T. Wasow & A. Akmajian (eds.). Formal Syntax [C]. New York: Academic Press. 71-132.
  • 7Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding [M]. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • 8Chomsky, N. 1982. Some Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding [M]. Cambridge, MA. : The MIT Press.
  • 9Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program [M]. Cambridge, MA. : The MIT Press.
  • 10Chornsky, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework [A]. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (eds.). Step by Step : Essays on Minirealist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik [C].Cambridge, MA. : The MIT Press. 89-155.

二级参考文献63

共引文献217

同被引文献313

引证文献18

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部