期刊文献+

改进的J-M模型及其在软件安全性评估中的应用 被引量:4

Improved J-M Model and Application to Software Safety Assessment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分析了软件可靠性和安全性之间的关系;针对安全软件测试剖面和操作剖面有不同的故障检测率,以及软件故障剔除时有引入新故障的可能,通过改变Jelinski-Moranda(J-M)可靠性模型相关假设及参数,提出了一个既能描述安全软件测试剖面与操作剖面不同,又能描述故障引入率的软件安全性评估模型;并给出了该安全性评估模型的性能度量.最后,对同一组铁路信号控制安全软件的失效数据进行分析,结果表明改进后的J-M评估模型比原J-M模型有着更好的拟合能力和预测能力. The relationship between software safety and reliability is analyzed. According to the different fault-detection rate between operational profile and test profile, and the probability of bringing new fault to the software during eliminating process, a new software safety assessment model is presented based on the J-M model, which not only can illustrate the difference between test profile and operational profile but also can describe fault-bring rate, and its performance measures are presented also. At last, a set of failure data of railway interlocking software is used to experiment. The result shows that the goodness-offit and predictive power of the new model is much better than J-M model.
出处 《小型微型计算机系统》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期269-273,共5页 Journal of Chinese Computer Systems
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(60674004)资助
关键词 安全软件 软件安全性 J-M模型 safety critical software software safety J-M model
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献3

共引文献15

同被引文献21

  • 1许宁,张毅坤.基于正交分层聚类算法软件可靠性模型的预测分析[J].计算机应用,2007,27(3):635-637. 被引量:6
  • 2G-14Americas Aerospace Quality Standards Committee.AS9100C-2009Quality Management Systems-requirements for Aviation,Space and Defense Organizations[S].2009.
  • 3RTCA.DO-178CSoftware Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification[Z].Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics,Inc.,2008.
  • 4MIL-STD-882D Standard Practice for System Safety Program Requirements[Z].Department of Defense,USA Military,1996.
  • 5国防科学技术工业委员会.GJB Z102-97软件可靠性和安全性设计准则[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1998.
  • 6国防科学技术工业委员会.GJB Z142-2004军用软件安全性分析指南[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2004.
  • 7国防科学技术工业委员会.GJB 900-90系统安全性通用大纲[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1991.
  • 8Ma Sasa,Liu Dongqing,Xu Aihua.Research on Safety Evaluation Method of Military Software[C]//Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Reliability,Maintainability and Safety.New York,USA:ACM Press,2009:718-722.
  • 9Garrett C,Apostolakis G.Context and Software Safety Assessment[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Human Error,Safety and System Development.Berlin,Germany:Springer,1998:46-57.
  • 10Houtermans M,Apostolakis G,Brombacher A,et al.The Dynamic Flowgraph Methodology as a Safety Analysis Tool:Programmable Electronic System Design and Verification[J].Safety Science,2002,40(9):813-833.

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部