摘要
通过对话机制创制出化解多元价值选择困境的普遍规则是立法机关的核心职责。可是,若这种对话不得不发生于欠缺民主性的法庭,那么所塑造出的规则的正当性就会受到质疑。作为补救措施,训练法官成为一个解释共同体的成员,并使其遵循特定的行为标准,则可以增加司法对话所蕴含的说服力。
It is the core duty of legislature to formulate the universal regulations through the dialogue mechanism to resolve the selection dilemma from the multiple values. If the dialogue has to happen in the courts short of democracy, however, the molded rules will be queried in legitimacy. It is a remedial measure to train the judges to become the members of an interpretive community and regulate them to abide by the specific standards, which can increase persuasiveness in the judicial dialogue.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第2期34-43,共10页
Law and Social Development
基金
南开大学亚洲研究中心资助项目(AS0707)
关键词
司法对话
立法对话
立法程序
解释共同体
judicial dialogue
legislative dialogue
legislative process
interpretive community
