期刊文献+

事件时间估计偏差理论述评 被引量:2

Why People Underestimate the Time of Completing a Task:A Review
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人们总是倾向低估完成某一任务的时间。计划谬误理论认为,时间低估倾向的原因是人们估计时间时忽视过去完成类似任务的经验,过于关注理想的任务计划和任务情景,从而导致乐观的时间估计。但是基于该理论的一些提高时间估计精确性的策略没有达到预期效果。针对这种不足,记忆偏差理论认为,人们利用的时间记忆带有偏差,从而导致偏差的时间估计。两个理论之间引起一些争论,但如果从解释水平理论的角度可以找到其相通之处。 People frequently underestimate how long it will take them to complete a task. The view of planning fallacy theory is that during the prediction process, people incorrectly use or ignore their memories of how long similar tasks have taken in the past because they take an overly optimistic outlook. Memory bias theory holds a different explanation: People base predictions of future duration on their memories of how long past events have taken, but these memories are systematic underestimates of past duration. People appear to underestimate event duration because they underestimate past event duration. Although there are some argues between these two theories, from the view of Construal Level Theory, theorists can find the sameness between them, they can coexist.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期207-212,共6页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 重庆市重点文科基地项目(200301003)
关键词 时间低估 计划谬误理论 记忆偏差理论 解释水平理论 time underestimation, planning fallacy, memory bias theory, construal level theory.
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Buehler R, Griffin D, Ross M. Exploring the “planning fallacy”: Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 67:366-381.
  • 2Buehler R, Griffin D, MacDonald H. The role of motivated reasoning ion optimistic time predictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1997, 23:238-247.
  • 3Boltz M G, Kupperman C, Dunne J. The role of learning in remembered duration. Memory & Cognition, 1998, 26: 903-921.
  • 4Taylor S E, Pham L B, Rivkin I D, Armor D A. Harnessing the imagination. American Psychologist, 1998, 53:429-439.
  • 5Koole S, Van't Spijker M. Overcoming the planning fallacy through willpower: Effects of implementation intentions on actual and predicted task-completion times. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2000, 30:873-888.
  • 6Buehler R Griffin D. Planning, personality, and prediction: The role of future focus in optimistic time predictions. Organizational Behavior and Human Processes, 2003, 92: 80-90.
  • 7Buehler R, Messerrey D, Griffin D. Collaborative planning and prediction: dose group discussion affect optimistic biases in time estimation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2005, 97:47-63.
  • 8Kahneman D,Tvcrsky A. Intuitive predictions: Biase and corrective procedures. TMS Studies in Management Science. 1979, 12:313-327.
  • 9Newby-Clark I R, Ross M, Buehler R, et al. People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios while predicting task completion times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2000, 3:171-182.
  • 10Griffin D, Buehler R. Biases and fallacies, memories and predictions: conmment on Roy, Christenfeld, and Mckenzie. Psychological Bulletin, 2005, 31:757-760.

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部