期刊文献+

抗CD-40L单抗加小剂量、短程CsA对肝移植大鼠生存期和Th1/Th2平衡偏移的影响

Effects of anti-CD40L pins short-course CsA on survival and Th1/Th2 cytokine balance in rats after orthotopic liver transplantation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的采用抗CD-40L单抗加小剂量CsA的联合免疫治疗,观察其对大鼠肝移植受体生存时间和Th1/Th2细胞因子谱变化的影响。方法在建立稳定大鼠肝移植模型的基础上,将整个实验分为4组。A组(同基因对照组):SD→SD;B组(同种异体基因免疫排斥组):SD→Wistar,不用任何治疗措施;C组:SD→Wistar,CsA应用d1~d5;D组:SD→Wistar,CsA应用d1~d5加抗CD-40L(CD-154)单抗应用d0、d2。观察各组大鼠肝移植受体生存时间,移植后第7天用ELISA法检测外周血细胞因子水平。结果A组、D组受体大鼠均可长期存活,B组生存时间仅为(13.8±2.4)d。IL-2、IFN-γ在B组的血清水平显著高于其余各组(P〈0.05),TNF-α在B组的表达水平高于不同免疫抑制组,但差异无显著统计学意义。IL-4、IL10较A组均有所增加,尤其D组的IL-10表达水平较B组显著增高(P〈0.05)。结论抗CD-40L单抗加小剂量CsA(伴或不伴DSBT)联合免疫治疗,可有效延长大鼠肝移植受体的生存时间,Th2类细胞因子的高水平表达与诱导移植耐受、抑制排斥反应有重要关联,有助于大鼠肝移植受体和移植肝的长期存活。 Objective To study the infLuence of anti-CD40L pLus short-course CsA on recipient survival ancl Th1/Th2 cytokine profile. Methods The recipient rats were divided into the following groups: group A: SD→SD, group B: SD→Wistar without any treatment, group C: SD→Wistar with CsA monotherapy from dl to dS, group d: SD→ Wistar with CsA from dl to d5 and anti-CD40L mAb on d0 ancl d2. The recipient survival was observed. On the post-transplant d7, ELIS was employed to detect the expression level of cytokines in peripheral blood. Results The survival time of recipients was significantly longer in group A ancl D than in group B. The serum levels of IL-2 ancl IFN-γ in group B were markedly higher than those in other 3 groups. However, the serum levels of IL-4 and IL-10 were remarkably higher in group D than in group B (P〈0.05). Conclnsion The combined immunotherapy can prolong graft survival time. The high expression level of Th2 cytokines is beneficial to long-term survival of recipients and graft.
出处 《中华肝胆外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 2008年第1期38-41,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
关键词 肝移植 抗CD-40L单抗 环孢素A(CsA) 大鼠 生存期 TH1/TH2细胞因子 Liver transplantation Anti-CD40L mAb CsA Rat, recipient survival Th1/Th2 cytokine
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1刘骅,曹晖,吴志勇.改良二袖套法大鼠原位肝移植180例[J].消化外科,2006,5(1):52-56. 被引量:13
  • 2Starzl TE, Murase N, AbuElmagd K, et al. Tolerance for immunosuppression in organ transplantation. Lancet, 2003, 361 : 1502-1510.
  • 3Gassel HJ, Kauczock J, Martens N, et al. Tolerance induction following orthotopic rat liver transplantation: cytokine production by CD4^+ T cells determines the immunological response. Transplant Proc, 2002, 34: 1429-1430.
  • 4Huang WH, Yan Y, De-Boer B, et al. A short course of cyclosporine immunosuppression inhibits rejection but not tolerance of rat liver allografts. Transplantation, 2003, 75: 368- 374.
  • 5Bolton EM. Regulatory T cells in transplantation: natural or induced? Transplantation, 2005, 79:643-645.
  • 6Wiesner RH, Rakela J, Ishitani MB, et al. Recent advances in liver transplantation. Mayo Clin Proc, 2003, 78:197-210.
  • 7Monaco AP. Prospects and strategies for clinical tolerance. Transplant Proc, 2004, 36: 227-231.
  • 8Nakano T, Kawamoto S, Lai CY, et al. Characterization of immunosuppressive factors expressed in serum by rat tolerogenic liver transplantation. Transplant Proc, 2005, 37: 80- 81.
  • 9Cobbold SP, Graca L, Lin CY, et al. Regualtory T cells in the induction and maintenance of peripheral transplantation tolerance. Transpl Int, 2003, 16: 66-75.
  • 10Koshiba T, Kitade H, Van Damme B, et al. Regulatory cell- mediated operational tolerance does not protect against chronic rejection. Transplantation, 2003, 76:588-597.

二级参考文献4

共引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部