3[1]Weaver WD,simes RJ,Betrin A,et al.Comparison of pvimary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial intraction:a guantitative review.JAMA 1997,278:2093～2098
4The TIMI Study Group. The thrombdysis inmyocardial in faction (TIMI) trial: phase 1findings [J]. N Engl J ned, 1985, 312 :932 - 936.
5Weaver WD. Simes RJ, Betiu A, et al.Comparison of Primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic theraoy for acute myocardial intravenous thrombolytic theraoy for acute myocardi: al infarction: A quantitative review [ J ]. JAMA, 1997, 278:2093 - 2098.
6Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, et al. Acomparison of immediate coronary with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction[J]. N Engl J Med , 1993, 328: 673.
7Tiefenbronn A J, Chardra MC, French WJ ,et al. Clinical expenience with Primary percutanous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with alteplase in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A report from the Second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction(NRMI-2) [J]. J Am coil Cardiol 1998,31 : 1240 - 1245.
8Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al.The SHOCK Investigators. Early revascularization acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock [ J ]. N Engl J Med,1999, 341: 625-634.
