期刊文献+

左氧氟沙星序贯疗法与头孢呋辛联合阿奇霉素治疗社区获得性肺炎的多中心、随机对照临床和药物经济学研究 被引量:15

A randomized controlled multicentre clinical trial of levofloxacin sequential therapy compared with combination therapy with cefuroxime and azithromycin in patients with community-acquired pneumonia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对左氧氟沙星的序贯疗法治疗社区获得性肺炎(CAP)进行临床疗效观察及药物经济学分析评价。方法以头孢呋辛联合阿奇霉素为对照药,采用多中心随机、开放、阳性对照研究方法。结果378例CAP患者中左氧氟沙星序贯疗法治疗(190例)的痊愈率和有效率分别为67.37%和96.84%,细菌阴转率高达96.77%,药物不良反应发生率为10.53%;对照药治疗(188例)的痊愈率和有效率分别为64.36%和96.28%,细菌阴转率为96.67%,药物不良反应发生率为7.98%;两组比较差异无统计学意义,平均疗程、住院天数和住院费用差异亦无统计学意义,试验组的成本-效果比为32.01,低于对照组(38.51)。结论左氧氟沙星的序贯疗法治疗CAP临床疗效较好,药物不良反应率较低,成本-效果比较低。 Objective To evaluate the clinical consequences and cost effectiveness of levofloxacin sequential therapy (intravenous infusion followed by oral administration) in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Methods Combination therapy with cefuroxime and azithromycin was used as control regimen. A randomized controlled multicentre clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of levofloxacin in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Results Of the total 378 cases with community-acquired pneumonia, 190 were treated with sequential levofloxacin, 188 were treated with cefuroxime plus azithromycin. In the levofloxacin treatment group, the cure and efficacy rate were 67.37% and 96. 84% respectively. The bacterial eradication rate was 96. 77%. The incidence of adverse drug reaction was 10. 53%. In cefuroxime and azithromycin combination group, the cure and efficacy rate were 64.36% and 96. 28% respectivel was 7.98 %. There was no significant treatment, days of hospital stay, and y. The bacterial eradication rate was 96.67%. The incidence of adverse drug reaction difference between the two groups in terms of these parameters. The mean duration of cost of hospitalization did not show significant difference between the two groups. However, levofloxacin sequential therapy (cost of 32. 01) was more cost-effective than cefuroxime plus azithromycin (cost of 38.51). The difference was statistically significant. Conclusions Levofloxacin sequential therapy is efficacious, safe and cost-effective in treatment of community acquired pneumonia.
出处 《中国感染与化疗杂志》 CAS 2008年第2期102-106,共5页 Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
基金 上海市重点学科建设项目资助 项目编号:B115
关键词 左氧氟沙星 序贯疗法 社区获得性肺炎 有效率 成本-效果比 Levofloxacin Sequential therapy Community-acquired pneumonia Efficacy Cost-effectiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Niederman MS, Mandell LA, Anzueto A. Guidelines for the management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. diagnosis, assessment of severity, antimieroblal therapy, and prevention[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2001,163 (7) : 1730-1754.
  • 2Quintiliani R, Cooper BW, Briceland LL, et al. Economic impact of streamlining antibiotic administration [J]. Am J Med, 1987, 82(4A):391-394.
  • 3社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗指南(草案)[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,1999,22(4):199-201. 被引量:1036
  • 4徐端正.药物经济学及其分析[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2000,19(2):139-142. 被引量:487
  • 5王鋆,张钧.药物经济学成本-效果分析[J].药学实践杂志,1995,13(4):193-197. 被引量:462
  • 6赵铁梅,刘又宁.肺炎链球菌对红霉素的耐药表型及耐药基因[J].中华内科杂志,2004,43(5):329-332. 被引量:59
  • 7File TM Jr, Milkovich G, Tennenberg AM, et al. Clinical implications of 750 rag, 5 day levofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia[J]. Curr Med Res Opin, 2004, 20 (9) : 1473-1481.
  • 8Ball P. Efficacy and safety of levofloxacin in the context of other contemporary fluoroquinolones: A review[J]. Current Therapeutic Research, 2003, 64 (9) : 646-656.
  • 9Pea F, Furlanut M. Levofloxacin PK/PD- from sequential therapy model to high dosage for critical patients[J]. J Chemother, 2004,16 (Suppl 2): 8-10.
  • 10Pelly L. IV-to-oral switch therapy for community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization: focus on gatifloxaein [J]. AdvThe, 2002, 19(5): 229-242.

二级参考文献16

  • 1张钧,郭震洲,王立强,任守英.药物经济学概述及在我国运用的几点设想[J].中国药房,1993,4(5):11-13. 被引量:94
  • 2阎依群.利用药品的成本效益分析减少药品消耗[J].中国药房,1994,5(3):6-7. 被引量:5
  • 3张钧.药物经济学概论[J].药学实践杂志,1995,13(1):3-6. 被引量:79
  • 4宋秉鹏,丁玉峰.药物经济学概述[J].药物流行病学杂志,1996,5(3):179-183. 被引量:305
  • 5National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.Pennsylvania:NCCLS,2002.M100-S12.
  • 6Statement 1996 CA-SFM Zone sizes and MIC breakpoints for non-fastidious organisms.Clin Microbiol Infect,1996,2 Suppl 1:S46.
  • 7Morosini MI,Canton R,Loza E,et al.In vitro activity of telithromycin against Spanish Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates with characterized macrolide resistance mechanisms.Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2001,45:2427-2431.
  • 8Sutcliffe J,Grebe T,Tait-Kamradt A,et al.Detection of erythromycin-resistant determinants by PCR.Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1996,40:2562-2566.
  • 9Kataja J,Huovinen P,Skurnik M,et al.Erythromycin resistance genes in group A streptococci in Finland.The Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial Resistance.Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1999,43:48-52.
  • 10Granizo JJ,Aguilar L,Casal J,et al.Streptococcus pneumoniae resistance to erythromycin and penicillin in relation to macrolide and beta-lactam consumption in Spain (1979-1997).J Antimicrob Chemother,2000,46:767-773.

共引文献1968

同被引文献184

引证文献15

二级引证文献110

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部