期刊文献+

中美战略稳定性的考察 被引量:10

Analysis on the Strategic Stability between China and the United States
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国近年来的战略武器调整与发展给中美之间的战略稳定性带来了新的不确定性。这种不确定性一方面有可能加大美国决策者对核威压的兴趣,另一方面可能迫使中国决策者为未来战略能力发展预留更大的余地。核禁忌对于维护中美战略稳定性关系重大,但是目前受到了一些边缘性的挑战。中美在核不扩散等合作中建立的互信有助于双边战略的稳定性,但仍需加强沟通。 The U.S. development of strategic weapons has brought new uncertainties to the strategic stability between China and the U.S. On the one hand, the uncertainties could make the U.S. decision makers be more interested in nuclear coercion, while on the other hand it would also force China to reserve large flexibility for future development of strategic capability. Nuclear taboo has been critical to the strategic stability between China and the U.S. and now it is facing some marginal challenges. China and the U.S. have built mutual trust upon nonproliferation cooperation but still need better communication.
作者 李彬 聂宏毅
出处 《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期13-19,共7页 World Economics and Politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Charles L. Glaser and Chaim Kaufmann, "What is the Offense -Defense Balance and Can We Measure it?" International Security, Vol. 22, No. 4,1988,pp.44-83.
  • 2Stephen Van Evera, "Offense Defense, and the Cause of War," International Security, Vol. 22, No.4,1998, pp.5-44.
  • 3Richard Price and Nina Tannenwald,“ Norms and Deterrence:The Nuclear and Chemical Weapons Taboos,”in Peter J. Katzenstein, ed., The Culture of National Security, Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York :Columbia University Press, 1996 ,pp. 124-125.
  • 4Charles L. Glaser and Chaim Kaufmann, " What Is the Offense-Defense Balance and Can We Measure It?" pp.44-83.
  • 5Stephen Van Evera, "Offense Defense, and the Cause of War,"pp. 5-44.
  • 6Ronald H. Rumsfeld,"Nuclear Posture Review Report," http://www.defenselink. mil/news/Jan2002/d20020109npr.pdf.
  • 7"Nuclear Posture Review [ Excerpts ],"http://www. globalsecurity. org/wmd/library/policy/dod/npr. htm.
  • 8Natural Resources Defense Council,"U. S, Nuclear Forces,2007," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,Vol.63, No.1,2007, pp.79-82.
  • 9Andrew Sessler, et al., “Countermeasures : A Technical Evaluation of the Operational Effectiveness of the Planned U. S. National Missile Defense System,” MIT/Union of Concerned Scientists, April 2000.
  • 10The Space and Missile Systems Center, “Fact Sheet: Space-Based Radar (SBR)” http://www.losanglees.af. mil/smc/pa/factsheets/sbr.htm.

二级参考文献33

  • 1吴展.核威慑[J].美国研究,1988,2(1):35-49. 被引量:2
  • 2时殷弘.美国国家导弹防御计划与中国的对策[J].太平洋学报,2000,8(4):39-44. 被引量:9
  • 3石斌.20世纪50年代美国政府关于核报复战略的内部争论[J].史学月刊,2004(11):88-94. 被引量:4
  • 4中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室.《中国的军备控制与裁军》白皮书,北京:1995年11月.
  • 5Michael S. Chase and Evan Medeiros, "China' s Evolving Nuclear Calculus : Modernization and Doctrinal Debate," in James Mulvenon and David Finkelstein, eds. , China' s Revolution in Doctrinal Affairs : Emerging Trends in the Operational Art of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Santa Monica: RAND Corp, 2003, pp. 119- 157.
  • 6http://www.defensegroupinc.com/cira/pdf/doctrinebook.pdf.
  • 7王厚卿等编.《战役学》,北京:国防大学出版社,2004年版.第372页.
  • 8中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室.《2000年中国的国防》,北京:2000年10月.
  • 9Information Office of the State Council of the People' s Republic of China, China' s National Defense in 2000, October 2000, Beijing.
  • 10Thomas C. Schelling, Arms and Influence, New Haven :Yale University Press, 1966, p. 69.

共引文献11

同被引文献145

引证文献10

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部