摘要
The phrase,’the Naturalist Fallacy’ initiated by Moore,used to be misled only as an ethical fallacy confusing to be with ought to.In fact,Moore’s fallacy is also epistemic,and it means that one confuses natural object with object of thought.That is the same as the Naturalist Absurdity(Widersinn),so-called in Husserlian phenomenology,which one confuses essence with its object.Moore was found to be strongly influenced by Brentano’s phenomenology in his Principia Ethica,through insight into the comparison to its earlier copy,The Elements of Ethics.From Husserlian viewpoint,Moore’s intrinsic properties or nature corresponds to noema or essence,and his intrinsic values are the representations of the properties in the act of willing.However,for Moore,one also makes a naturalist fallacy confusing representation with presentation.
The phrase,'the Naturalist Fallacy' initiated by Moore,used to be misled only as an ethical fallacy confusing to be with ought to.In fact,Moore's fallacy is also epistemic,and it means that one confuses natural object with object of thought.That is the same as the Naturalist Absurdity(Widersinn),so-called in Husserlian phenomenology,which one confuses essence with its object.Moore was found to be strongly influenced by Brentano's phenomenology in his Principia Ethica,through insight into the comparison to its earlier copy,The Elements of Ethics.From Husserlian viewpoint,Moore's intrinsic properties or nature corresponds to noema or essence,and his intrinsic values are the representations of the properties in the act of willing.However,for Moore,one also makes a naturalist fallacy confusing representation with presentation.
出处
《哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第2期48-53,共6页
Philosophical Research
