期刊文献+

高校体育教师职业倦怠量表的编制 被引量:20

Development of Job-Burnout Inventory for P.E. Teachers in Universities
原文传递
导出
摘要 职业倦怠是指在一定时间内从事某项工作时,在工作和其他方面压力下对所从事的工作产生的倦怠情绪和心理变化。近年来国内外的一些学者在职业倦怠方面所从事的相关研究取得了一些成果,并已将此项研究拓展到了教学领域。此研究的目的是:编制高校体育教师职业倦怠量表。方法:使用自编问卷调查268名高校体育教师。结果:使用SPSS11.0统计软件进行因素分析,得出3个因子(分量表):情绪衰竭、去个性化、低成就感。3因子的特征值分别为4.463、2.482、1.890,3因子的变异量分别为23.488%、13.066%、9.9462%,3因子总解释率为46.501%。总量表及分量表的Cronbach a系数分别0.864、情绪衰竭0.887、低成就感0.655、去个性化0.779。结论:自编高校体育教师职业倦怠问卷具有良好的结构效度和内部一致性信度,达到可使用质量标准。 job bumout(JB)is the weary emotion and the psychological change that is produced when someone is engaged in a certain kind of job during a certain period of time to his or her job under the pressure of the job and some other aspects. In recent years, domestic and foreign scholars have made some achievements in correlative research of JB and have developed it to teaching area. Objective: To develop and validate the job-burnout questionnaire for measuring P.E. teachers in universities. Methods: Totally 268 P.E. teacher from university in Beijing through a self-made survey inventory, The result shows that from factor analysis by SPSSl1.0, 3 factor(subscales) are obtained: physical and emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and low achievement, the feature values are 4. 463, 2. 482 and 1. 890 respectively, the variance are 23. 488%, 13. 066%, 9. 9462% respectively, the total explanatory rate is 46. 501%. The Cronbach alpha coefficients of the whole scale and 3 subscales are 0. 864, 0. 887, 0. 655 and 0. 779 respectively. Conclusion : burnout scale for P.E. teachers in universities has stmctttral reliability and internal validity.
出处 《北京体育大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期251-252,285,共3页 Journal of Beijing Sport University
关键词 体育教师 高校 职业倦怠 量表 编制 P, E, teachers in universities universities job-burnout scale formation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献36

  • 1徐长江.中学教师职业紧张状况及其原因的调查研究[J].浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版),1998,24(6):120-123. 被引量:83
  • 2王文丽,李玉荣.诺基亚 “人本管理”文化的启示[J].中外企业家,2003(6):46-49. 被引量:6
  • 3Leiter MP, Clark D, Durup J. Distinct Models of Burnout and Commitment among Men and Women in the Military. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1994,30 : 63 - 82.
  • 4Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Maslach C, etal. MBI- General Survey. In: Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP (Eds.). Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual (3rd ed. ). Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Pyschologists Press, 1996.
  • 5Schutte N, Toppinen S, Kallmo R,etal. The factorial validity of the Maslach burnout inventory - general survey ( MBI -GS) across occupational groups and nations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2000,73:53- 66.
  • 6Dean JW, Brandes P, Dharwadkar R. Organizational cynicism. Academy of Management Review, 1998,23:341 - 352.
  • 7Cordes CL, Dougherty TW. A review and an integration of research on job burnout. Academy of Management Review,1993,18:621 - 656.
  • 8Pines A, Aronson E. Why managers burn out. Sales & Marketing Management, 1989,141 (2) : 34 - 44.
  • 9Pines A. Burnout. In: Goldberger L, Breznitz S (Eds.). Handbook of Stress. New York: The Free Press,1993.386- 4013.
  • 10Hobfoll SE. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 1989,44: 513- 524.

共引文献329

同被引文献228

引证文献20

二级引证文献107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部