期刊文献+

应用MRI评价胰腺癌胰周血管侵犯预测胰腺癌的可切除性 被引量:11

MRI in the evaluation of peripancreatic vessel invasion and resectability of pancreatic carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价MRI判断胰腺癌胰周血管侵犯程度的价值,探讨MRI预测胰腺癌可切除性的最佳界点。方法搜集经手术病理证实的胰腺癌患者41例,均行MRI平扫及增强扫描,37例加做冠状位增强磁共振血管造影(MRA)。术前根据MRI表现,判断胰周血管侵犯情况,按照肿瘤对周围血管侵犯程度的不同,采用1级、2a级、2b级、3a级、3b级和4级进行评价,统计各分级血管的条数,并与手术结果对照。计算以2级和2a级作为可切除判断标准的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确率应用受试者工作特性曲线(ROC)确定MRI预测胰腺癌可切除性的最佳界点。结果41例患者中,切除22例,其中20例为根治性切除,2例为姑息性切除。与手术结果对照,MRI共误诊7条血管,其中动脉3条,静脉4条。以1级、2a级、2b级、3a级和3b级作为可切除的标准,判断肿块不可切除的敏感性分别为78.3%、84.8%、67.4%、56.5%和47.8%。ROC曲线显示,以2a级作为MRI预测胰腺癌可切除的最佳界点。结论胰周血管侵犯2a级可作为MRI预测胰腺癌可切除的最佳界点。 Objective To investigate the role of MRI in evaluating the peripancreatic vessel invasion and resectability of pancreatic carcinoma based on the comparison of MRI image with surgical exploration, and try to establish the criteria for assessment of the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of resectability. Methods Forty-one pancreatic carcinoma patients confirmed by pathology received preoperative plain and contrast enhanced MRI scan, and 37 of them had additional coronal MRA scan. Peripancreatic vessel invasion was preoperatively assessed based on MRI features, and the vessel invasion degree from the uninvolved to the severely involved was divided into 6 grades represented by 1,2a, 2b, 3a, 3b and 4,respectively. Compared with the findings during the surgery, the sensitivity and specificity of each vessel invasion grade were studied and the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) was drawn. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of resectability evaluation based on 2 and 2a degree were calculated respectively. The resectability of involved arteries and veins of grade 2 were also analyzed. Results Of the 41 patients, 22 had resectable tumor, with 20 curative resection and 2 palliative. Compared with the findings during surgery, seven vessels including three arteries and four veins were not correctly interpreted by MRI. If grade 1,2a,2b,3a and 3b was used as the resectable standard,respectively, the sensitivity to predict the unresectbility was 78.3%, 84.8%, 67.4%, 56.5% and 47.8%, respectively. Receiver operator characteristic curve demonstrated that grade 2a was the optimal critical point. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of grade 2a in predicting the unresectbility were 84.8%, 98.5%, 92.9%, 96. 6% and 95.9%. Condtmion Our data showed that grade 2a (tumor involvement 〈 2 cm long and 〈 1/2 circumference of the vessel) may be more sensitive and accurate in predicting the resectability, which may be considered as the line of demarcation between the respectable and unresectable cases in clinical practice.
出处 《中华肿瘤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第11期846-849,共4页 Chinese Journal of Oncology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30470504)
关键词 磁共振成像 胰腺肿瘤 胰周血管侵犯 手术可切除性 MRI Pancreatic neoplasms Peripancreatic vessels invasion Resectability
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1母德清,彭淑牖,王国凤.胰头癌扩大根治术的临床意义[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2004,26(3):173-176. 被引量:9
  • 2Delbeke D, Pinson CW. Pancreatic tumors: role of imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2004, 11:4-10.
  • 3Smith SL, Rajan PS. Imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with emphasis on muhidetector CT. Clin Radiol, 2004, 59:26-38.
  • 4李卉,曾蒙苏,周康荣,陈刚,缪熙音,张利军,殷允娟,汤敏.多层螺旋CT胰腺检查:多期增强扫描的最佳延迟时间研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(3):287-290. 被引量:35
  • 5Brugel M, Rummeny EJ, Dobritz M. Vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer: value of multislice helical CT. Abdom Imaging, 2004, 29: 239-245.
  • 6Lopez Hanninen E, Amthauer H, Hosten N, et al. Prospective evaluation of pancreatic tumors: accuracy of MR imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography and MR angiography. Radiology, 2002, 224:34-41.
  • 7Pamuklar E, Semelka RC. MR imaging of the pancreas. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 2005, 13:313-330.
  • 8王冬青,曾蒙苏,靳大勇,楼文辉,纪元,饶圣祥,陈财忠,李纫晨.2D和3D MRI结合技术在胰腺癌诊断中的应用[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2007,29(3):216-220. 被引量:15
  • 9Lu DS, Reber HA, Krasny RM, et al. Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1997,168 : 1439-1443.
  • 10Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Horstmann O, et al. Preoperative local MRI-staging of patients with a suspected pancreatic mass. Eur Radiol, 2002, 12:296-303.

二级参考文献44

  • 1李卉,曾蒙苏,周康荣,陈刚,缪熙音,张利军,陆秀良,刘豪,陆怡,殷允娟.胰腺癌侵犯胰周主要血管的CT表现分析[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(3):293-297. 被引量:36
  • 2胡先贵.努力提高胰腺癌术后长期生存率[J].第二军医大学学报,2005,26(8):842-844. 被引量:7
  • 3殷允娟,曾蒙苏,李卉,陈财忠,沈继章,施伟斌.MRI对胰腺癌胰周血管侵犯的手术可切除性评价[J].临床放射学杂志,2005,24(9):792-795. 被引量:17
  • 4Kawarada Y, Das BC, Naganuma T, et al. Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer. Does extended lymphadenectomy provide a better outcome? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2001,8:224-229.
  • 5Tsiotos GG, Farnell MB, Sarr MG. Are the results of pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer improving? World J Surg, 1999, 23:913-919.
  • 6Japan Pancreas Society. General Rules for Cancer of the Pancreas. 4rd.Tokyo: Kanehara Publishing Co, 1996.14-15.
  • 7Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Kobayashi H, et al. Lymphatic flow in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Cancer, 1992,70:.2061-2066
  • 8Pedrazzoli S, DiCarlo V, Dionigi R. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter,prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group. Ann Surg, 1998, 228:508-517.
  • 9Nagai H, Kuroda A, Morioka Y. Lymphatic and local spread of T1 and T2 pancreatic cancer. A study of autopsy material. Ann Surg, 1986,204 : 65-71.
  • 10Hirai I, Kimura W, Ozawa K, et al. Perineural invasion in pancreatic cancer. Pancreas, 2002,24:15-25.

共引文献89

同被引文献78

引证文献11

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部