期刊文献+

市场分割与汇率低估 被引量:2

Market Segmentation and Currency Undervaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章基于市场分割探讨了不同市场的定价行为以及均衡汇率问题。文章从微观层面的市场定价机制出发,分析垄断企业的最优供给决策。由于存在市场分割,垄断企业根据市场需求定价,使高端产品在后进国家因需求少而价格较高,在先进国家因需求多而价格较低,从而导致市场分割下同一产品的价格存在巨大差异。进一步地,通过在巴拉萨—萨缪尔森效应模型中引入商品定价结构进行分析后指出,后进国家的汇率相对先进国家出现低估的原因,不仅在于相对劳动生产率差异,还有由于市场分割以及市场异质性存在而引起的价格歧视这一重要因素。文章最后以人民币/美元为例进行了初步的经验分析,发现1994年前后人均收入水平对汇率的影响出现了转折性的变化。 This paper investigates the linkage between pricing to market behavior and equilibrium exchange rates based on market segmentation. This paper analyzes monopoly firms' optimal supply decision based on microeconomic mechanism of pricing. Due to market segmentation and pricing strategies of monopoly firms based on demands of different markets, producer will price high-tech product higher in developing countries than developed countries because developing countries have less demand than developed coun- tries, which will lead to price discrimination. Furthermore, we prolong Balassa-Samuelson Effect model by introducing the structure of pricing, and find that besides relative labor productivity, price discrimination caused by market segmentation and market heterogeneity is an important factor lead to developing country's currency undervaluation relative to developed country. At last we empirically analyze the exchange rate between Renminbi and U.S. dollar, and find that Chinese national income per person plays a different part in exchange rate before and after 1994.
作者 曾利飞
出处 《财经研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期65-77,共13页 Journal of Finance and Economics
基金 教育部重大攻关项目(05JD00012) 中国博士后基金(项目编号:20070410157) 中国经济国际竞争力研究国家哲学社会科学创新基地资助
关键词 巴拉萨——萨缪尔森效应 价格歧视 汇率低估 市场分割 Balassa-Samuelson effect price discrimination undervaluation market segmentation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1姜波克.均衡汇率理论和政策新框架的四探索[D].复旦大学金融研究院工作论文.
  • 2李安心,孙立坚.购买力平价难以成立的重要原因——从“价格歧视”的新观点来论述[J].世界经济研究,2003(1):81-85. 被引量:5
  • 3卢锋.我国劳动生产率增长及国际比较(1978-2004)-人民币实际汇率长期走势研究之一[D].北京大学中国经济研究中心讨论稿,NO.C2006004,2006.
  • 4曾利飞,徐剑刚,唐国兴.开放经济下中国新凯恩斯混合菲利普斯曲线[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006,23(3):76-84. 被引量:55
  • 5Balassa B. The purchasing power parity doctrine: A reappraisal[J]. Journal of Political Economy , 1964, 72 (6).584 -596.
  • 6Paul A Samuelson. Theoretical notes on trade problems[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1964, 46(2): 145-154.
  • 7Obstfeld M, Rogoff K. Exchange rate dynamics redux[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1995, 103:624-660.
  • 8http://www.cpirc.org. cn/news/rkxw_gn_detail.asp? id= 5725.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Fuhrer, J. (2997), the (Un ) Importance of Forward-Looking Behavior in Price Specifications,Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29, 338-350.
  • 2Gali, J. and Gertler, M. (1999), The Science of Monetary Policy, A New Keynesian Perspective, Journal of Economic Literature, 37 (2), 1661-1707.
  • 3Genberg H. , Pauwels L.L. (2003), An Open Economy New Keynesian Phillips Curve, Evidence from Hong Kong. HEI Working Paper No: 03/2003.
  • 4Guay, A. and F. Pelgrin (2004), The U. S. New Keynesian Phillips Curve : An Empirical Assessment, Bank of Canada Working Paper 2004-2035.
  • 5Hansen, L. (1982), Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators,Eeonometriea, 50, 1029-1054.
  • 6Rumler, F. , (2005), Estimates of the Open Economy New Keynesian Phillips Curve for Euro Area Countries, ECB Working Paper No. 496.
  • 7Aw,Bee-Yan, "Price Discrimination and Markups in Export Markets" ,Journal of Development Economics,Dec 1993,42 2, 315-36.
  • 8Bresnahan, Timothy, "Empirical Studies of Industries with Market Power," in R. Schmalensee and R.Willings, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization.vol.2,1989.
  • 9Hallwood,C.P. and R.MacDonald, "International Money and Finance",3nd., Blackwell Press. Chpter 7,122-154.
  • 10Richardson, J. David, "Some Empirical Evidence on Commodity Arbitrage and the Law of One Price",Journal of International Economics, 1978.

共引文献58

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部