期刊文献+

经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术与磁共振胰胆管造影术诊断胆胰疾病44例分析 被引量:1

Comparison of ERCP and MRCP in dignosis of pancreatobiliary diseases (a clinical ananlysis of 44 cases)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨磁共振胰胆管造影术(MRCP)对胆胰疾病的诊断价值。方法回顾分析同时行MRCP与经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的44例胆胰疾病患者的资料。结果对胆道结石性病变、胆道高位肿瘤诊断符合率高;对胆总管下端及乳头周围肿瘤性病变,MRCP能提出病变部位,不能鉴别病因,但可提供肿瘤侵犯及转移情况;对胆总管下端炎性狭窄诊断也不满意;对局部结构复杂、异常者,因无直视功能易产生漏诊和误诊。结论MRCP给胆胰疾病诊断提供了更多的选择,仍不能替代ERCP。 [Objeetive] To evaluate the dignostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in pancreatobiliary disease. [Methods] 44 patients with biliary and pancreatic duct trouble, who had MRCP and ERCP from Junuary 2005 to December 2006, were analyzed retrospectively. [Results] The accuracy for MRCP and ERCP in choledocholithiasis and upper-middle part of bile duct tumor was content. But it was useful in diagnosing periampulla carcinoma or diseases of bile duct and pancreas. [Conclusions] MRCP is a good option in dignosting biliary and pancreatic diseases. But it can′t replace ERCP yet.
出处 《中国内镜杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期128-130,共3页 China Journal of Endoscopy
关键词 经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术 磁共振胰胆管造影术 胆胰疾病 MRCP ERCP pancreatobiliary diseases
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献24

  • 1Kaltenthaler E,Brav O,Vergel Y,et al.A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance chlangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde chlangiopancreatography[J].Health Technol Assess,2004,8:1-102.
  • 2Romagnuolo J,Bardou M,Rahme E,et al.Magnetic resonance chlangiopancreatography:a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease[J].Ann Intern Med,2003,139:547-557.
  • 3Ysh TS,Jan YY,Tseng GH,et al.Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction:magnetic resonance chlangiopancreatograph findings[J].Am J Gastroenterol,2000,95:432-440.
  • 4Schwartz LH,Lefkowitz RA,Panicek DM,et al.Breathhold magnetic resonance chlangiopancreatography in the evaluation of maligant pancreaticobiliary obstruction[J].J Comput Assist Tomogr,2003,27:307-314.
  • 5Testoni P A,Bagnolo F.Pain at 24 hours associated with amylase levels greater than 5 times the upper normal limit as the most reliable indicator of post-ERCP pancreatitis[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2001,53:33-39.
  • 6Varghese J C,Farrell M A,Courtney G,et al.A prospective comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiopancteatograohy with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary tract disease[J].Clin Radiol,1999,54:513-520.
  • 7Becker C D,Grossholz M,Becker M,et al.Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis:diagnostic accuracy of MR choliangiopancreatography[J].Radiology,1997,205:523-530.
  • 8Griffin N,Wastle M L,Dunn W K,et al.Magnetic resonance cholangiopancteatography verus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithasis[J].Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2003,15:809-813.
  • 9Romagnuolo J,Bardou M,Rahme E,et al.Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography:a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease[J].Ann Intern Med,2003,139:547-557.
  • 10Lee M G,Lee H Y,Kim M H,et al.Extrahepatic biliary disease:3D MR cholangiopancreatography com-pared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreato-graphy[J].Radiology,1997,202:663-669.

共引文献55

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部