期刊文献+

超音速环形引射器空气引射启动特性试验 被引量:7

Experimental Investigation on the Start Performances of the Supersonic Annular Air Ejector
下载PDF
导出
摘要 建立了超音速环形引射系统,对环形引射器空气引射启动特性进行了试验研究。试验结果表明:管道马赫数越大,则系统启动压强越高,同时盲腔真空度越高;混合室收缩比越小,系统启动压强越低;若管道马赫数较大,而第二喉部长径比和亚音速扩压段面积比过小,引射器启动过程可能不稳定,甚至无法启动;混合室收缩比、环型引射器扩压管道参数对盲腔压强无影响。 The air ejector test facility was established to investigate the start performance of supersonic annular ejector. The investigation ind/cates that the higher the roach number in pipe, the higher start pressure and vacuum in cavity, and that the mixing-room contraction ratio and the pipe configuration of the system deeply influence the start performance, but they have little influence on the vacuum in cavity.
出处 《国防科技大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第1期1-4,共4页 Journal of National University of Defense Technology
基金 国家"863"计划资助项目(2005AA992020)
关键词 超音速引射器 环形引射器 启动特性 supersonic ejector annular ejector the start performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Yang T T,Hurlock S C,Dickerson R A,et al.High Preasure Recovery,High Mach Number Nitrogen Based Chemical Oxygen-iodine Laser[C]//Lasers 2000 Conference,December 2000.
  • 2Savin A V,Ignstiev A A,Fedotov A V.Numerical Simulstion of Gao dynamic Flows in Pressure Recovery Systoms of Supersonic Chemical Lasers[C]//international Synposium on Gas Flow and chemical Lascrs and High-power Laser Conference,2001,410-413.
  • 3Dution J C,Mikkelsen C D,Addy A L.A Theoretical and Experimental Investigations of the Constant Area Supersonic-supersonic Ejector[J].AIAA J,1982,20(10).
  • 4徐万武,谭建国,王振国.高空模拟试车台超声速引射器数值研究[J].固体火箭技术,2003,26(2):71-74. 被引量:22
  • 5李海军.喷射器性能、结构及特殊流动现象研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2005.
  • 6Hickmank E,Hill P G,Gibert G B.Analysis and Testing of Compressible Flow Ejectors with Variable Aren Tubes[J].ASME Journal of basic Engineering,1972,94:407-416.
  • 7廖达雄,任泽斌,余永生,杨永.等压混合引射器设计与实验研究[J].强激光与粒子束,2006,18(5):728-732. 被引量:47
  • 8徐万武,邹建军,王振国,周进.超声速环型引射器启动特性试验研究[J].火箭推进,2005,31(6):7-11. 被引量:22

二级参考文献9

  • 1[1]Taylor,Delbert.Supersonic ejectors[R].GARD-AG-163.
  • 2[2]R C Bauer,R C German.The effect of second throat geometry on the performauce of ejectors without induced flow[R].AEDC-TN-61-133.
  • 3[3]James W Hale.Comparison of diffuser-ejector performance with five different driving fluids[R].AEDC-TDR-63- 207,1963.
  • 4Bauer R C, German R. The effect of secod throat geometry on the performance of ejectors without induced flow [ R ].AEDC-TN-61-133.
  • 5Jones W L, Friee H G and Lorenzo C F. Experimental study of zero-flow ejectors using gasous nitrogen[ R]. NASA TND-203.
  • 6Kazuyasu Matsuo, Yoshiaki Miyazato, Heuy-Dong Kim.Shock train and pseudo-shock phenomena in internal gas flows[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences. 1999, 35:33-100.
  • 7Emanuel G. Optimum performance for a single-stage gaseous ejector[J]. AIAA Journal ,1974, 14(9) : 1292-1296.
  • 8Keenan J H, Neumann E P, Lustwerk F. An investigation of ejector design by analysis and experiment[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics,1950, 17: 299-809.
  • 9Ginoux J J. Supersonic ejectors[R]. AGARD-AG-163, 1972.

共引文献72

同被引文献34

引证文献7

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部