期刊文献+

直面书院研究中的分歧与辨析

Facing Squarely the Disagreements and Arguments in the Studies of Academies of Classical Learning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文对学术界关于书院名称始见时间的分歧、关于具有教学功能书院起始时间的分歧、建立在雕版印刷技术发明这一生产力基础上的书院与科举、关于书院发展的阶段和若干里程碑、关于书院办学性质的争议、关于书院办学程度的争议、古代书院有无教授管理、书院"制度"、书院的现代意义等九个问题,提出自己的观点。 The present paper is to study nine issues concerning academies of classical learning: analyses made by academic circles on the starting years of academies' names, disagreements on the initiating time of academies with instructional functions and on academies and imperial civil examinations based on the invention of engravings, arguments about the stages of academies' development and their milestones, the nature of academy running and the levels of academies, as well as the discussions about whether or not there were professors of academies, about "the rules and regulations" of academies, and about the modern The author also put forward his own points of view. engaged in the management significance of academies.
作者 李才栋
机构地区 江西教育学院
出处 《南京晓庄学院学报》 2008年第1期94-101,共8页 Journal of Nanjing Xiaozhuang University
关键词 书院研究 分歧 辨析 studies on academies of classical learning disagreements discrimination and analysis
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部