期刊文献+

SAR图像相干斑滤波性能评估模型 被引量:7

Measurement Model and Performance Evaluation for Speckle Filter of SAR Images
下载PDF
导出
摘要 提出针对单极化合成孔径雷达(SAR)图像相干斑滤波算法性能的分层检验模型和综合评价方法。模型分相干斑抑制程度和目标微波后向散射系数保持程度两个层次,包含的指标有等效视数、信号杂波比、回波辐射度损失、均值偏差、空间分辨率损失和峰值旁瓣比偏差六项。综合评价运用了多指标决策(MCDM)理论,通过线性分级的模糊语义标度,运用有序加权平均(Ordered Weighted Averaging,OWA)算子对分层指标检验值构成的性能偏好矩阵进行集结,得到相干斑滤波器的性能综合评价结果。通过真实和模拟的SAR图像数据,有效地对增强Lee、Gamma MAP、EPOS、小波软阈值和Kuan滤波算法进行了性能检验和评估,得到与主观综合评价一致的结果。 This paper proposes a measurement model and a performance evaluation method for speckle filter of single polarimetric synthetic aperture radar images, including six criteria: equivalent number of looks (ENL), target-to-clutter ratio, radiometric loss, bias of mean value, bias of spatial resolution, and bias of peak sidelobe ratio. Based on multicriteria decision making(MCDM) principle, by linear fuzzy linguistic quantifier, ordered weighted averaging(OWA) operator is used to aggregate the performance preference matrix induced by all measurement results, Finally the evaluation results are obtained. Computational experiments by use of simulated and real SAR images to verify and evaluate such algorithms as refined Lee, Gamma MAP, EPOS, wavelet thresholding, and Kuan filter show that the proposed model is effective and the result is in accordance with that of visual evaluation.
作者 王晓军 孙洪
出处 《雷达科学与技术》 2008年第1期29-34,38,共7页 Radar Science and Technology
关键词 合成孔径雷达图像 性能评价 相干斑滤波 有序加权平均算子 synthetic aperture radar images performance evaluation speckle filtering ordered weighted averaging operator
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献35

  • 1Zadeh L A. A computational Approach to Fuzzy Quantifiers in Natural Languages [J]. Comput. Math. Appl., 1983, 9.. 149-184.
  • 2Delgado M, Verdegay J L, V'da M A. On Aggregation Operations of Linguistic Labels [J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems,1993, 8: 351-370.
  • 3Torra V. Negation Functions Based Semantics for Ordered Linguistic Labels [J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1996, 11:975-988.
  • 4Herrera E A Sequential Selection Process in Group Decision Making with Linguistic Assessment [J]. Inform Sci., 1995, 85: 223-239.
  • 5Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A Model of Consensus in Group Decision Making under Linguistic Assessments [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996, 79: 73-87.
  • 6Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Linguistic Decision Analysis: Steps for Solving Decision Problems under Linguistic Information [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 115: 67-82.
  • 7Yager R R. On Ordered Weighted Averaging Aggregation Operators in Multi-criteria Decision making []]. IEEE. Trans. on Systems, Man,and Cybemetics, 1988, 18.. 183-190.
  • 8Torra V. The Weighted OWA Operator [J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1997, 12: 153-166.
  • 9Bordogna G, Pasi G. Linguistic Aggregation Operators of Selection Criteria in Fuzzy Information Retrieval [J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems , 1995, 10: 233-248.
  • 10Yager R R, Filev D P, Sadeghi T. Analysis of Flexible Structured Fuzzy Logic Controllers [J]. IEEE. Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1994, 24: 1035-1043.

共引文献50

同被引文献61

引证文献7

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部