期刊文献+

两种颈淋巴清扫术对口腔鳞癌患者生存率和生存质量的影响 被引量:2

Survival Rate and Quality of Life for Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated by two Kind of Radical Neck Dissection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比分析新型改良根治性颈淋巴清扫术(modified radical neck dissection,MRND)和传统根治性颈淋巴清扫术(classical radical neck dissection,CRND)对口腔鳞癌患者生存率和生存质量的影响。方法:46例临床Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期的口腔鳞癌患者(TNM分期在T_2N_1M_0~T_4N_3M_0之间)随机分为2组:CRND组23例和MRND组23例。应用SPSS 10.0软件统计分析2组患者术后3、5年生存率,并用华盛顿大学生存质量问卷评价2组患者的生存质量。结果:①CRND组和MRND组3年生存率分别为60.7%、61.8%(P>0.05);5年生存率分别为48.6%、50.9%(P>0.05)。②CRND组和MRND组生存质量平均总分各为535.27±112.38、619.81±98.19(P<0.05)。结论:本研究采用的新型改良根治性颈淋巴清扫术与传统根治性颈淋巴清扫术相比,没有降低患者术后生存率,但显著地提高了患者术后的生存质量,适合临床推广应用。 Objective: To investigate the effects of classical radical neck dissection (CRND)and a new modified radical neck dissection (MRND) on survival rate and quality of life (QOL) of the patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Methods: 46 patients with Clinical stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ OSCC were divided randomly into two groups: group CRND (23 cases) and group MRND (23 cases). Survival rate of 3-year and 5-year were analyzed by SPSS10.0 statistic software, UW-QOL questionnaire was used to evaluate QOL of different groups. Results: 3-year survival rate in group CRND and group MRND were 60.7% and 61.8% respectively(P〉0.05 ), while 5-year survival rate were 48.6% and 50.9% respectively (P〉0.05). Average total score of QOL of group CRND and group MRND were 535.27±112.38 and 619.81±98.19 respectively(P〈0.05 ).Conclusion: MRND can improve quality of life without survival rate decrease of OSCC.
出处 《口腔颌面外科杂志》 CAS 2008年第1期35-38,共4页 Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
关键词 颈淋巴清扫术 口腔 鳞状细胞癌 生存率 生存质量 neck dissection oral squamous cell carcinoma survival rate quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献26

  • 1温玉明.口腔癌根治性颈淋巴清扫术的合理术式[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2005,23(1):5-7. 被引量:9
  • 2温玉明.保留颈外静脉的双侧颈淋巴联合根治术[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1988,6(2):73-73.
  • 3[2]Weingarten CZ. Simultaneous bilateral radical neck dissection preservation of the external jugular vein. Arch Otolaryngol,1973,97(4):309-311
  • 4[3]Shah JP, Candela FC, Poddar AK,et al. The patterns of cervical lymph node metastases from squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity.Cancer,1990,66(1):109-113
  • 5[4]Schuller DE,Hamaker RC,Lingeman RE,et al. Acomparative analysis of disability resulting from radical and modified neck dissection. Head Neck Surg, 1983,6(8):551-554
  • 6[5]Bocca E, Pingnataro O, Oldini O, et al. Functional neck dissection: an evaluation and review of 843 cases. Laryngoscope,1984;94(7):942-945
  • 7[6]Krause HR, Bremerich A, Herrmann M. The innervation of the trapezius muscle in connection with radical neck dissection. J Craniomaxillofac Surg,1991,19(2):87-89
  • 8Crean SJ, Hoffman A, Potts J, et al. Reduction of occult metastatic disease by extension of the supraomohyoid neck dissection to include level V [J]. Head Neck, 2003,25(9) :758 - 762.
  • 9Crile GW. Excision of cancer of the head and neck [ J ]. JAMA,1906, 47(25): 1780 - 6.
  • 10Martin HE, Del Valle B, Ehrlich H, et al. Neck dissection[J]. Cancer, 1951, 4(3) :441 - 499.

共引文献26

同被引文献24

  • 1廖贵清,侯劲松,黄洪章.保存颈内静脉的改良根治性颈淋巴清扫术的临床评价[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2005,21(1):22-24. 被引量:6
  • 2谭爱梅,吴月凤,玉梅,于新颖,柏木有纪子.康复训练应用于乳腺癌术后患者的实践[J].中华护理杂志,2005,40(11):824-826. 被引量:66
  • 3王力,崔成立,王合义,罗永胜,张文龙.副神经与颈丛交通支的解剖学观测[J].包头医学院学报,2007,23(3):234-237. 被引量:3
  • 4周岚,郑根建,罗军.保留颈深神经和颈外静脉的改良颈淋巴清扫术的临床研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2007,23(5):743-744. 被引量:1
  • 5Muhammet Dilber,Fikret Kasapoglu,Levent Erisen,O?uz Basut,Ilker Tezel.The relationship between shoulder pain and damage to the cervical plexus following neck dissection[J]. European Archives of Oto - Rhino - Laryngology . 2007 (11)
  • 6Shah S,,Har-El G,Rosenfeld RM.Short-term and long-term quality of life after neck dissection. Head and Neck . 2001
  • 7Kuntz AL,Weymuller EA Jr.Impact of neck dissection onquality of life. Laryngoscope . 1999
  • 8Cuccia G,Shelley OP,Alcontres FS,et al.Evidence ofsignificant sternocleidomastoid atrophy following modifiedradical neck dissectiontype III. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery . 2006
  • 9Jeffrey E,Deborah E,Carol R,et al.Pain,quality of life,and spinal accessory nerve status after neck dissection. Laryngoscope . 2000
  • 10Siddiquee BH,Amin SA,Sharif A.Comparative study ofradical neck dissection vs.modified radical neck dissectionin metastatic neck gland. Mymensingh Med Journal . 2007

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部