期刊文献+

美国众议院对自由贸易协议的态度:一个实证研究 被引量:2

An Empirical Research on US House Voting on Free Trade Agreement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用贸易政策的政治经济学方法实证研究美国众议院对美国区域性自由贸易协议的态度及其决定因素。研究表明,众议员投票时体现的对自由贸易协议的态度与众议员的政党属性、收取的捐款、所在选区的行业分布等因素密切相关,共和党众议员比民主党众议员更支持自由贸易协议,收取工会组织捐款越多的众议员,越倾向于反对自由贸易协议,来自农业州的众议员更有可能支持自由贸易协议。 Based on the theory of political economy of trade policy, this paper probes into the determinants of Representatives' attitude towards bilateral free trade agreements. The empirical study shows that Representatives' attitudes have some relationship with party affiliation, contribution, and home state. Democratic Representatives or Representatives with more union contribution, or nonagricuhural state Representatives tend to be more protective.
作者 高国伟
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期15-18,共4页 International Economics and Trade Research
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目《全球化发展战略中的中国外贸增长方式转变与竞争优势培育研究》(编号:07AJY007)
关键词 众议院 自由贸易协议 政治经济学 House of Representatives Free Trade Agreement political economy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Mayer, Wolfgang. Endogenous Tariff Formation [J]. American Economic Review, 1984 (74), 970-985.
  • 2Magee, Stephen P., William A. Brock, and Leslie Young. Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Formation [M]. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1989.
  • 3Hillman, Arye L. The Political Economy of Protection [M]. London, Harwood, 1989.
  • 4Grossman, Gene M. and Elhanan Helpman. Protection for Sale [J]. American Economic Review, 1994 (84), 833-850.
  • 5Rodrik, Dani. What Does the Political Economy Literature on Trade Policy (not) Tell Us That We Ought to Know?[J]. NBER Working Paper No. 4870, 1994.
  • 6Stolper, W. F. and P.A. Samuelson. Protection and Real Wages [J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1941, 58-73.
  • 7Jones, R. W. A Three-Factor Model in Theory, Trade and History. In Trade, Balance of Payments and Growth: Essays in Honor of Charles P. Kindleberger [M]. Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1971.
  • 8Baldwin, Robert and Christopher Magee. Is Trade Policy for Sale? Congressional Voting on Recent Trade Bills [J]. Public Choice, 2000 (105), 79-101.

同被引文献30

  • 1屠新泉.党派政治与美国贸易政策的变迁[J].美国研究,2007,21(4):67-80. 被引量:15
  • 2李淑俊,倪世雄.美国贸易保护主义的政治基础——以中美贸易摩擦为例[J].世界经济与政治,2007(7):69-74. 被引量:14
  • 3戴斯勒,2006.《美国贸易政治》,王恩冕、于少蔚译,中国市场出版社.
  • 4余万里,(2013)《美国贸易决策机制与中美关系》,时事出版社.
  • 5Acemoglu, D., D. Autor, D. Dorn, G. H. Hanson, B. Price, (2014) "Import Competition and the Great U.S. Employment Sag of the 2000s," NBER Working Papers 20395, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • 6Anderson, K, (1993) "Agency Discretion or Statutory Direction: Decision Making at the US ITC," Journal of Law and Economics 36, 915-935.
  • 7Baldwin, R.E., (1985) The Political Economy of US Import Policy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • 8Baldwin, R.E, and J. Steagall, (1994) "An Analysis of Factors Influencing Itc Decisions in Antidumping, Countervailing Dutyand Safeguards Cases," Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 130, 290-307.
  • 9DeVault, J., (1993) "Economics and the Intemational Trade Commission," Southern Economic Journal 60, 463-478.
  • 10DeVault, J., (2002) "Congressional Dominance and the International Trade Commission," Public Choice 110, 1-22.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部