论“领主属宾句”中领有名词的句法地位

"领主属宾句"是汉语中争议较多的一种句法结构,其非宾格动词同时带有"主语"和"宾语"的现象一直无法得到完美解释。本文旨在探讨"领主属宾句"中领有名词的句法地位,基于Luigi Rizzi的"分裂CP假设"(split CP hypothesis)和Chomsky最简方案(MinimalistProgram)的理论框架,对该种句式从新的角度进行了句法分析。本文认为,"领主属宾句"中的领有名词并非句子的主语,而是从非宾格动词内论元的定语位置移到了句首的Spec-Top话题位置。移位后的话题与其语迹享有相同的格与题元角色,其格为属格(Genitive Case),其题元角色为POSSESSOR。

The‘Possessor-Subject Possessee-Object Sentence＇ （abbreviated as PSPOS） is a disputable syntactic structure in Mandarin Chinese. By now, not a satisfactory explanation has been given to the phenomenon of an unaccusative verb taking both a ‘Subject＇ and an ‘Object＇. This paper aims to discuss the syntactic position of the Possessor in the PSPOS. Based on Luigi Rizzi＇s split CP hypothesis and Chomsky＇s Minimalist Program, we argue that the so-called Possessor is in fact not a Subject of the sentence, but a Topic moved to the Spec-Top position from the modifier position in the internal argument of the unaceusative verb. The moved Possessor shares the same Case and theta-role with its trace in the original position; thus the Genitive Case and the theta-role of POSSESSOR.