期刊文献+

中国大学生英语口语水平研究 被引量:41

An empirical study of oral English proficiency of Chinese college students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究通过分析一项英语口语考试成绩,探讨目前中国大学生英语口语水平,以对中国高校英语口语教学提供较为详尽的反馈信息。参加该口试的180名受试来自六类高校(分别是重点院校英语专业、文科、理科和地方院校英语专业、文科、理科)的学生,覆盖各层面的中国大学生。从语言能力(语音、语法、语篇、言外语用能力、社会语用能力)和策略能力(灵活交流能力、体势语、副语言)两方面共八个小项上的得分分析来看,相当一部分受试的英语口头交际能力薄弱,具体表现为,未达到本族语者语音语调水平,交际手段不丰富,以及非言语交际能力匮乏。这些方面的问题亟待在教学中引起重视。 This paper analyses and discusses the results of an oral English test with a view to assessing the oral English proficiency of Chinese college students and informing English teaching practice at the universities in China. The test was administered to 180 Chinese college students that were sampled from six different types of universities. Test takers’ responses were rated according to an analytic evaluation system that encompassed both language competence (e.g. pronunciation, grammar, textual coherence, illocutionary pragmatic competence, sociolinguistic pragmatic competence) and strategic competence (e.g. flexible interaction, body language, paralanguage). An analysis of the test results shows that a fairly high percentage of test takers failed to attain a satisfactory level of oral English proficiency as manifested in poor pronunciation and intonation, inadequate communicative skills and lack of nonverbal communicative abilities. It is suggested that due attention should be given to these problems in classroom instruction.
作者 刘芹
机构地区 上海理工大学
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第1期83-89,共7页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 上海市教委发展基金 上海理工大学科研基金资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Bachman, L. F. 1990, Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing [M ]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 2Bachman, L. F. 2004. Statistical Analyses for Language Assessment [ M ]. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press,
  • 3Bachman, L. F, & A. Kunnan. 2005. Statistical Analyses for Language Assessment Workbook [M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 4Cohen, A. 1980. Testing Language Ability in the Classroom. [M]. Newbury House Publishers, Inc.
  • 5Canale, M. 1983. On some dimensions of language proficiency [A]. In J. Oiler (ed.). Issues in Language Testing Research [ C ]. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House, 333-342.
  • 6Canale, M. & M. Swain. 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing [J]. Applied Linguistics 1:1-47.
  • 7Harrison, R. 1965. Nonverbal communication:Exploration into time, space, action, and object [A]. In J. Campbell & H. Hepler (eds.). Dimensions in Communication [C].Wadsworth Publishing Co., Inc.,158-174.
  • 8Henning, G. & E. Cascallar. 1992. A Preliminary Study of the Nature of Communicative Competence [M ]. Princeton, NJ:Educational Testing Service.
  • 9Hughes, A. 2000. Testing for Language Teachers [ M ]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press/北京:外语教学与研究出版社.
  • 10Morlan, D. & G. Tuttle. 1976. An Introduction to Effective Oral Communication [M]. The Bobbs-Merrill Co. Inc.

二级参考文献52

共引文献415

同被引文献331

引证文献41

二级引证文献160

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部