期刊文献+

公司治理机制互动的实证研究 被引量:17

Empirical Study on the Interaction among Multiple Corporate Governance Mechanisms
原文传递
导出
摘要 解决公司中的委托代理问题和有效监督管理层需要各种治理机制共同发挥作用。利用2002年~2005年中国上市公司的平衡面板数据,研究大股东股权竞争、董事会构成、经营者股权激励和监事会行为4种公司治理机制的互动关系。实证结果显示,大股东股权竞争与董事会构成之间存在替代效应,大股东股权竞争与经营者股权激励、董事会构成与监事会行为之间存在互补效应,这表明中国上市公司的治理机制关系呈现出复杂的特性。这一研究结论为继续深化中国的公司治理改革提供了经验证据,提高公司治理水平需要理顺各种公司治理机制的关系,实现治理机制的协同发展。 Corporate governance mechanisms play a corporative role in resolving the principal - agent problems and effectively monitor the top management. Using the panel data of Chinese listed firms during 2002 - 2005, this study makes an empirical test on the interaction relationship among four kinds of governance mecha- nisms, viz. the fight for ownership among large shareholders, beard composition, managerial ownership and supervisory beard behavior. The empirical results show that the substitution effect exists between the fight for ownership among large shareholders and beard composition: moreover, the complement effect exists not only between the fight for ownership among large shareholders and managerial ownership but also between board composition and supervisory beard behavior. These indicate that the relationship among ,Carious corporate governance mechanisms in Chinese listed companies is greatly complicated. The results provide some empirical evidences for improving the reform of corporate governance in China. In order to improve corporate governance, all relationship among multiple governance mechanisms needs to be arranged to achieve the coordinated development.
机构地区 南开大学商学院
出处 《管理科学》 CSSCI 2008年第1期2-13,共12页 Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(70532001) 国家自然科学基金(70372025) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(04JJD630004) 2007年度天津哲学社会科学规划项目重点课题(TJGL07-83) 教育部振兴行动计划985工程南开大学哲学社会科学创新研究基地项目(950A94505-B08)
关键词 公司治理机制 互动 互补效应 替代效应 corporate governance mechanisms interaction complement effect substitution effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1Fama E F. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1980, 88 (2) :288-307.
  • 2Fama E F, M C Jensen. Separation of Ownership and Control [ J ] . Journal of Law Economics, 1983,26 (2) :301-325.
  • 3Jensen M, W H Meckling. Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure [ J ] . Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3 (4) :305-360.
  • 4Murphy K L. Corporate Performance and Managerial Remuneration : An Empirical Analysis [ J ] . Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1985,7 ( April ) : 11-42.
  • 5Lewellen W C, Loderer K Martin. Executive Compensation and Executive Incentive Problems:An Empirical Analysis [ J ] . Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1987,9(3) :287-310.
  • 6Hart O D. The Market Mechanism as an Incentive Scheme [ J ] . Bell Journal of Economics, 1983,14 (2) :366-382.
  • 7Kenneth J Rediker, Anju Seth. Boards of Directors and Substitution Effects of Alternative Governance Mechanisms [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995,16(2) :85-99.
  • 8Agrawal A, Knoeber C. Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders [ J ]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1996,31 (3) :377-397.
  • 9Tammy K Berry, L Paige Fields, Michael S Wilkins. The Interaction among Multiple Governance Mechanisms in Young Newly Public Firms [ J ]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2006,12 (3) :449-466.
  • 10Zhou Jian. The Dynamics of Competitive Advantage: An Integrative Framework [ C ] //LAN Hua. Proceedings of 2006 International Conference on Management Science Engineering (13th). Harbin : Harbin Institute of Technology Press, 2006:842-847.

二级参考文献170

共引文献2712

同被引文献276

引证文献17

二级引证文献211

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部