期刊文献+

磁共振成像与多层CT对肝脏局灶性病变定性的比较研究 被引量:5

Characterization of focal liver lesions: comparison of MRI and MSCT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较综合MRI(1.5T或3T)多种序列与MSCT(16或64层)动态增强扫描对肝脏局灶性病变定性的价值。方法回顾性分析行腹部MSCT与MRI检查(两种检查间隔时间不超过1个月)且发现肝脏局灶性病变的41例患者(75个病灶)的诊断结果。结果MSCT鉴别诊断良恶性病灶的敏感度为80.77%(21/26),特异度为68.42%(26/38)。MRI鉴别诊断良恶性病灶的敏感度为93.33%(28/30),特异度为97.56%(40/41)。两者敏感度之间的差异无统计学意义(P=0.311),MRI的特异度高于MSCT(P<0.001)。对于具体的各类病灶,MRI的总体诊断准确率(86.36%,57/66)高于(P=0.004)MSCT(64.41%,38/59)。结论MRI对肝脏局灶性病变的定性能力优于MSCT。 Objective To compare the efficacy of plain and contrast enhancement MRI (1.5T or 3T) and dynamic contrast enhanced MSCT (16- or 64-slice) for characterization of focal liver lesions. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 41 patients who underwent MSCT and MRI within one month period for evaluation of focal liver lesions. Triple-phase or dual-phase dynamic contrast enhancement was performed on a 16- or 64-slice MSCT. MRI sequences included transverse T1-weighted images acquired as fast spoiled gradient (FSPGR) in-phase and out-of-phase dual-echo, transverse T2-weighted images with respiratory triggering acquired as fat-suppressed fast spin echo (FSE) or fast recovery fast spin echo (FRFSE), and breath-hold coronal T2-weighted images acquired as single shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) or fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA). Additional dynamic gadolinium enhancement imaging was performed on 20 patients. A total of 75 lesions (32 malignant and 43 benign) were finally confirmed either by histopathology or combined clinical data, typical imaging features and follow-up for a period of at least one year. Chi-Square tests were used to compare the performances of MSCT and MRI in characterization of lesions, respectively. Results The sensitivity and specificity in differentiation of benign from malignant lesions on MSCT were 80.77% (21/26), 68.42% (26/38) and on MRI were 93.33% (28/30), 97.56% (40/41), respectively. There was no significant difference in sensitivity between two imaging techniques (P=0.311), but the specificity of MRI was significantly higher than that of MSCT (P〈0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of MRI based on lesion types (86.36%, 57/66) was significantly better (P=0.004) than that of MSCT (64.41%, 38/59). Conclusion MRI was superior to MSCT for characterization of focal liver lesions.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期242-246,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 肝脏局灶性病变 体层摄影术 X线计算机 磁共振成像 比较研究 Focal liver lesions Tomography, X-ray computed Magnetic resonance imaging Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Ward J, Robinson PJ, Guthrie JA, et al. Liver metastases in can didates for hepatic resection : comparison of helical CT and gadolinium-.and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology, 2005, 237 (1):170-180.
  • 2Holalkere NS, Sahani DV, Blake MA, et al. Characterization of small liver lesions: added role of MR after MDCT. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2006,30(4) :591-596.
  • 3Oto A, Tamm EP, Szklaruk J. Multideteetor row CT of the liver. Radiol Clin North Am. 2005,43(5) :827-848.
  • 4Schwartz LH, Gandras EJ, Colangelo SM, et al. Prevalence and importance of small hepatic lesions found at CT in patients with cancer. Radiology, 1999,210(1) :71-74.
  • 5Rode A, Bancel B, Douek P, et al. Small nodule detection in cirrhotic livers: evaluation with US, spiral CT, and MRI and correlation with pathologic examination of explanted liver. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2001,25(3) :327-336.
  • 6Tomemori T, Yamakado K, Nakatsuka A, et al. Fast 3D dynamic MR imaging of the liver with MR SmartPrep : comparisoh with helical CT in detecting hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Imaging, 2001,25(5) :355-361.
  • 7Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K, Yi T, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver damage: prospective comparison of detection with dynamic MR imaging and helical CT of the whole liver. Radiology, 1996,200(1) :79-84.
  • 8Yoshioka H, Takahashi N, Yamaguchi M, et al. Double arterial phase dynamic MRI with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2002, 16(3) : 259-266.
  • 9Ito K, Fujita T, Shimizu A, et al. Multiarterial phase dynamic MRI of small early enhancing hepatic lesions in cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis: differentiating between hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas and pseudo lesions. AJR, 2004,183(3):699-705.
  • 10Mori K, Yoshioka H, Takahashi N, et al. Triple arterial phase dynamic MRI with sensitivity encoding for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of the diagnostic accuracy among the early, middle, late, and whole triple arterial phase imaging. AJR, 2005,184(1) :63-69.

同被引文献19

引证文献5

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部