期刊文献+

我国反垄断法的域外适用 被引量:29

Extraterritorial Application of China's Antimonopoly Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据我国反垄断法第2条,我国反垄断法也适用于我国境外发生但对我国市场竞争能够产生排除、限制竞争影响的垄断行为。这说明,我国反垄断法具有域外适用的效力。本文探讨了反垄断法域外适用产生的原因以及存在的问题。本文指出,为了避免和减少管辖权的冲突和法律冲突,我国反垄断法域外适用应当考虑国际法上被广泛认可的一般原则,特别是"直接、重大和合理预见的效果"的原则和"国际礼让"原则。 According to Article 2 of Chinas Antimonopoly Law, this law shall apply also to the activities conducted outside of P. R. China that eliminate or have restrictive effect on competition in the domestic market. That means that China's Antimonopoly Law based on the effect doctrine has long-arm jurisdiction over restrictive conducts created in foreign coun- tries. This article indicates the justification of the effect doctrine, and its problems in practice. The author suggests that along with the implementation of Article 2, Antimonopoly Authority should consider the international customary law, i.e. the comity principle, and as pre-condition for the jurisdiction over a restriction outside China, the restriction has a direct, substantial and reasonably foreseeable effect in China.
作者 王晓晔
出处 《上海财经大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2008年第1期30-37,共8页 Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
关键词 反垄断法 域外适用 效果原则 国际礼让 antimonopoly law extraterritorial application effect doctrine comity
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1[1]United States v.Aluminum Co.of America,148 F.2d 416,65 U.S.P.Q.6 (2d Cir.1945).
  • 2[2]Howard Adler/David F Laing,Application of US Antitrust Laws to Merger and Joint Ventures in a Global Economy (1),European Business Law Review,March 1997,p.82.
  • 3[3]United States v.Aluminum Co.of America,148 F.2d 416,444,443 (2d Cir.1945).
  • 4[4]Timberlane Lumber Co.v.Bank of America,549 F.2d 597 (9th Cir.1976).
  • 5[5]William C.Holmes,Antitrust Law handbook 2001 Edition,p.709.
  • 6[6]Access Telecom,Inc.v.MCI Telecommunications Corp.,197 F.3d 694 (5th Cir.1999).
  • 7[7]William C.Holmes,Antitrust law Handbook 2001 Edition,West Group,p.712.
  • 8[9]See U.S.Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission,Antitrust Enforcement Guidelines for International Operations,Sec.3.14 (April 1995).
  • 9[10]Joseph P.Griffin,Foreign Governmental Reactions to U.S.Assertions of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction,E.C.L.R.2/1998,pp.65~66.
  • 10[12]Trugman-Nash,Inc.v.New Zealand Dairy Bd.,954 F.Supp.733 (S.D.N.Y.1997).

同被引文献550

引证文献29

二级引证文献199

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部