摘要
在我国法学界,"法律行为"有两种不同含义,一是民法上的含义,意指意思效果行为。这也是法律行为的原初含义。另一是法理学上的含义,意指具有法律效果的行为。经济法的法律行为应采何意?从相关的论述看,多是在法理学意义上使用的。笔者之见,法律行为应回归其原初含义,而最能反映经济法特征的法律行为就是"干预行为",即公共经济组织的"公意"表示及执行行为,包括宏观调控和市场规制行为。
There are two different meanings for the concept of legal act in our country. One is in the civil law, and the other is in jurisprudence. What is the meaning in economic law? From the related treatise, it mainly is in jurisprudence. However, this paper argues that it should be in the civil law, returning to its original meaning. What can reflect the legal act in economic law most is the intervention behavior, namely the public opinions in public economy organization, including macro-control and regulation behavior.
出处
《上海财经大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2008年第1期38-45,共8页
Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics