美国专利侵权判定标准的新动向——兼In re Seagate Technology,LLC案介评
摘要
2007年8月20日,美国联邦巡回上诉法院在In re Seagate Technology,LLC案中打破了故意侵权判定规则的约束,减轻了被控侵权人的义务,加重了专利权利人的举证责任,这一新动向值得我们给予充分的注意。
出处
《电子知识产权》
CSSCI
2008年第3期48-51,共4页
Electronics Intellectual Property
参考文献11
-
1FEDCIR.In re Seagate Technology, LLC.(Miscellaneous Docket No.830) [EB/OL]. (2007-08-20) [2007-11 - 25].http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/M830.pdf.
-
2Scheinfeld R C. ,Bagley P H..Willful Infringement: The Federal Circuit Overrules Itself [EB/OL].(2007-09-26) [2007-11-28] .http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id= 1190797374549.
-
3余惠如.美国故意侵害专利认定暨律师与当事人间通讯及诉讼工作内容免揭露之最新发展[R/OL].圣岛国际知识产权实务报导,2007,9(10)[2007-12-05].http://www.saint -island.com.tw/report/data/2007_10%E6%9C%88%E6%99%BA%E8%B2%A1%E5%A0%B1%E5%B0%8EPDF%E7%89%88.pdf
-
4Zaharoff H.Court Rulings Remake Patent Law [EB/OL]. (2007-10-01) [2007-12 -05].http://www.mbbp.com/resources/iptech/newsletters/pdfs/ip1007.pdf.
-
5Ambrogi R.Assessing the Impact of Seagate [EB/OL]. (2007-09-06) [2007-12-05].http://www.ims-expertservices.com/newsletters/sept/sizing-up-seagate-092507.htm.
-
6Bonella MJ.A Reasonable, Balanced Answer to In Re Seagate Tech[EB/OL]. (2007-08-21) [2007-12-05].http://www.iptoday.com/articles/2007-08-bonella.asp.
-
7Barquist C, Tucher A and Crotty A.In re Seagate Technology, LLC: The Federal Circuit Abolishes the Duty of Due Care in Willfulness Cases[EB/OL].(2007-08-25)[2007-12-01 ]. http: //www.mofo. com/docs/pdf/SeagateTechnology Update.pdf.
-
8Higgins B.Seagate vs. Patent Reform Act of 2007[EB/OL].(2007-08 -29) [2007 - 12 -05].http://www.marylandiplaw. com/2007/08/articles/patents/patent -reform -act/seagate - vs-patent-reform-act-of-2007/
-
9Underwater Devices, Inc. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., 717 F.2d 1380, 219 USPQ 569(Fed.Cir.1983).
-
10In re Seagate Tech., LLC, Misc. Docket No. 830 (Fed. Cir..JAN. 26,2007).
-
1何刚.美国专利侵权判定规则研究——兼In re Seagate Technology,LLC案介评[J].科教文汇,2008(10):153-153.
-
2郑妙,郝维青.对完善商标侵权损害赔偿制度的几点思考[J].企业家天地（下旬刊）,2007(2):101-102. 被引量：1
-
3李俊慧.知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度初探[J].现代经济信息,2015,0(6X):348-348.
-
4TECHNOLOGY LAW[J].US-China Law Review,2008,5(1):62-64.
-
5高晶,朱训平.浅析我国外观设计侵权判定标准[J].法制与社会,2008(15):72-73. 被引量：3
-
6张兵.浅谈外观设计专利权的侵权判定[J].大观周刊,2012(3):67-67.
-
7保护知识产权 促进社会发展[J].人民司法,1994(9):2-2.
-
8张慧霞.美国专利侵权惩罚性赔偿标准的新发展[J].知识产权,2016,26(9):104-109. 被引量：13
-
9马家昱.论惩罚性赔偿制度在我国的立法适用[J].魅力中国,2008,0(18):52-53.
-
10Sturgis Sobin.美国专利诉讼判断故意侵权的新标准[J].电子知识产权,2007(11):6-6.
