期刊文献+

电力系统动态仿真中参数不确定性影响的评估 被引量:8

Evaluation on Impact of Parameter Uncertainty in Power System Dynamic Simulation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 电力系统仿真模型中存在不确定参数,动态仿真结果的可信度因此受到影响。基于暂态稳定约束最优潮流,提出一种评估参数不确定性情况下动态仿真结果可信度的方法。通过构造一组非线性优化问题,确定参考系统中待评估变量动态性能的边界轨迹,以此作为评估参数不确定性情况下动态仿真结果可信度的依据。运用连续线性规划方法求解这组优化问题,所提出的评估方法的有效性在IEEE 9节点系统和IEEE 39节点系统上得到了验证。 There are typically uncertain parameters in power system models, and it is consequently impacted that the credible degree of dynamic behaviors of power system simulations relied upon these uncertain models. Based on optimal power flow constrained by transient stability, this paper presents a computational method for evaluating the credible degree of dynamic behaviors of simulations in the condition of parameter uncertainty. In the method, a set of nonlinear optimization problems is formulated to determine dynamic performance bounds around nominal values. The performance bounds are the basis of evaluating the credible degree of dynamics of simulations in the condition of uncertainty. These nonlinear optimization problems are solved by a successive linear programming approach. The proposed method is tested on the/EEE 9-bus testsYstem and the IEEE 39-bus test system. The results show that the proposed method is effective in evaluating the credible degree of dynamic behaviors of power system simulations in the condition of parameter uncertainty.
出处 《电力系统自动化》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期15-19,共5页 Automation of Electric Power Systems
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50477032) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助项目(NCET-04-0529)
关键词 电力系统动态仿真 暂态稳定约束 最优潮流 参数不确定性 连续线性规划 power system dynamic simulation transient stability constraint optimal power flow parameter uncertainty successive linear programming
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1KOSTEREV D N, TAYLOR C W, MITTELSTADT W A. Model validation for the August 10 1996 WSCC system outage. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1999, 14(3): 967-979.
  • 2CRAVEN R, GEORGE T, PRICE G, et al. Validation of dynamic modelling methods against power system response to small and large disturbances// Proceedings of CIGRE General Session, Aug 28-Sep 4, 1994, Paris, France.
  • 3HISKENS I. Nonlinear dynamic model evaluation from disturbance measurements. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2001, 16(4): 702-710.
  • 4IEEETask Force Report. Load representation for dynamic performance analysis. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1993, 8(2) : 472-482.
  • 5薛禹胜,刘强,Zhaoyang DONG,Gerard LEDWICH,袁越.关于暂态稳定不确定性分析的评述[J].电力系统自动化,2007,31(14):1-6. 被引量:77
  • 6XIN H, GAN D, QIU J, et al. Methods for estimating stability regions with application to power systems. European Trans on Electric Power, 2007, 17(2): 113-133.
  • 7HISKENS I, ALSEDDIQUI J. Sensitivity, approximation and uncertainty in power system dynamic simulation. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2006, 21(4) : 1808-1820.
  • 8HOCKENBERRY J, LESIEUTRE B. Evaluation of uncertainty in dynamic simulation of power system models: the probabilistic collocation method. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2004, 19(3) : 1483-1491.
  • 9AL-OTHMAN A K, IRVING M R. Analysis of confidence bounds in power system state estimation with uncertainty in both measurements and parameters. Electric Power Systems Research, 2006, 76(12) : 1011-1018.
  • 10SCALA M L, TROVATO M, ANTONELLI C. On-line dynamic preventive control: an algorithm for transient security dispatch. IEEE Transon Power Systems, 1998, 15(2): 601- 610.

二级参考文献72

共引文献117

同被引文献139

引证文献8

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部