输液时两种胶布粘贴法及拔针后两种按压方法的比较

Comparison of the effectiveness between two sticking ways of adhesive tapes for transfusion and two pressing ways after needle withdrawal

目的比较输液时两种胶布粘贴方法及拔针后两种按压方法的效果。方法从临床病例中选出101例需要输液治疗的病人,采用自身对照法,即采用交叉胶布粘贴法、拔针后采用指压法(A法)和不交叉胶布粘贴法及拔针后用大鱼际按压法(B法)并进行比较。结果B法明显优于A法,两组比较差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论用不交叉胶布粘贴法、拔针后用大鱼际按压法对减轻疼痛及静脉穿刺后皮下瘀血、局部血肿有明显效果,具有临床应用意义。

Objective To study the effectiveness between the two sticking ways of adhesive tapes for transfusion and two pressing ways after needle withdrawal. Methods 101 cases needed transfusion were included into this study. During different periods of transfusion, the transfusion needle of every patient was fixed with traditional cross-over adhesive plaster, and traditional finger-pressing was used after needle withdrawal （method A）; and for the same patient, the needle was fixed with uncross-over adhesive plaster and then thenar-pressing was used after needle withdrawal（method B）. The effectiveness was compared between the two methods. Results Method B was superior to method A, and the difference of two methods was statistically significant （P〈0. 05）. Conclusion The effectiveness is evident to palliate pain and subcutaneous ecchymosis and local haematoma by using uncross adhesive plaster to fix the transfusion needle during transfusion and thenar-pressing after needle withdrawal.