摘要
在共同侵权行为的成立标准上,有客观说和主观说两种不同观点。我国司法解释结合了两种学说,具有理论上的先进性,但在操作上不易理解和执行。在共同侵权行为的成立标准上把主观说和客观说结合起来,可以根据行为人在主观上有无意思联络,将共同侵权行为分为有意思联络的共同侵权(共同故意)和无意思联络的共同侵权,然后再根据行为人的行为结合状态,将无意思联络的共同侵权划分为过失关联型和行为关联型。
On contributory infringement standard, there are two different views——objective doctrine and subjective doctrine. In China ,judicial interpretation combines the two doctrines, which is forward in theory but not easy to comprehend and operate. With the combination, according to whether there is intention-communication, contributory infringement can be divided into intention-communi-cation contributory infringement and non-intention-communication contributory infringement. Then based on the combination state of infringers'behaviors, the non-intention-communication contributory infringement can be divided into negligence-related type and behavior-related type.
出处
《云南大学学报(法学版)》
2008年第1期82-85,共4页
Jorunal of Yunan University Law Edition
关键词
共同侵权行为
意思联络
过失关联型
行为关联型
Contributory infringement
Intention-communication
Negligence-related type
Behavior-related type