期刊文献+

N_1+N_2结构中的意念焦点 被引量:6

The Ideational Focus in N_1+N_2 Structure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在N1+N2复合名词结构中,N1和N2的线性顺序不可随意调换,这也就意味着两者不可能处在完全相同的认知地位上。传统的中心词概念本质上是语法性的,它仅适合描述英语,但不适合描述汉语。即便引入结构中心和语义中心的概念,仍无法满足对汉语复合名词进行准确描述的要求。人们也尝试用认知语言学的理论来对该结构进行阐释,然而其不可靠的阐释基础或者对语言实际的误读,使得所得出的结论令人怀疑。在以上分析的基础上,结合汉英复合名词的语言实际,本文提出一个意念焦点的概念,用来对英汉语复合名词进行统一的阐释。 In N1+N2 compound structure, the sequential position of Nl and N2 cannot be changed freely, which indicates that the two elements are always in different cognitive statuses. The traditional concept of head is grammatical in nature, and is only suitable for the description of English instances, not Chinese ones. Though the concepts of structural head and semantic head have been distinguished, there still exist some difficulties in a precise description of Chinese compound nouns. Cogni- tive theories have been employed in the analysis of compound structure, but the conclusions derived from these analyses are doubtful in that the interpretation strategies seem to be not convincing enough or the linguistic facts have been misunder- stood. Based on the analysis of the above problems, and an in-depth exploration into the linguistic facts of both English and Chinese, a new concept of Ideational Focus is proposed, which is believed to be capable of interpreting all the N1+N2 compound instances in both English and Chinese.
作者 王军
出处 《外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期30-34,共5页 Foreign Language Education
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(项目编号为07BYY008)成果之一
关键词 N1+N2结构 复合名词 中心词 意念焦点 N1+N2 structure compound noun head Ideational Focus
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Bloomfield, L. Language [M]. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1933/:北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2002.
  • 2Fauconnier, G. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language [M]. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1985.
  • 3Fauconnier, G. Mappings in Thought and Language [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  • 4Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. Mandarin Chlnese: A Functional Reference Grammar [M]. California: University of California Press, 1981.
  • 5Lyons, J. Introduetion to Theoretical Linguisties[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.
  • 6Ungerer, F. & Schmld, H. J. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2001.
  • 7崔希亮.语言理解与认知[M].北京:北京语言文化大学出版社,2002:295.
  • 8范开泰 张亚军.现代汉语语法分析[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2000..
  • 9冯胜利.汉语双音化的历史来源[A].史有为.从语义信息到类型比较[C].北京:北京语言文化大学出版社,2001.
  • 10劲松.现代汉语轻声动态研究[M].北京:民族出版社,2001.

二级参考文献44

  • 1Levi, J The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
  • 2Downing, P A On the creation and use of English compounds[J]. Language, 1977, 53:810-842.
  • 3Coulson, S Semantic Leaps: Frame-shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction [M].Cambridge: CUP, 2001.
  • 4Frank, B Sense generation: A "quasi-classical" approach to concepts and concept combination[J].Cognitive Science, 1995, 19: 441-505.
  • 5Murphy, G L Comprehending complex concepts[J]. Cognitive Science, 1988, 12: 529-562.
  • 6Murphy, G L Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 1990, 29: 259-288.
  • 7Gagne, C L & Shoben, et al . Relation-based combinations versus property-based combinations:A test of the CARIN theory and the dual process theory of conceptual combination[J]. Journal of Memory and language, 2000, 42: 365-389.
  • 8Wisniewsky, E J Construal and similarity in conceptual combination[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 1996, 35: 434-453.
  • 9Wisniewsky, E J Conceptual combination:Possibilities and esthetics[A]. T B Ward et al .Creative Thought : An Introduction of Conceptual Structures and Processes[C]. Washington DC: APA Books, 1997.
  • 10Markman, A B & Wisniewsky, E J Similar and different: The differentiation of basic level categories[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory & Cognition, 1997, 23: 54-70.

共引文献128

同被引文献24

引证文献6

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部