期刊文献+

28043例新生儿听力筛查结果分析 被引量:28

The analysis of 28 043 cases of neonatal hearing screening
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨新生儿听力障碍的发生情况及高危因素,以便早期干预治疗。方法采用耳声发射仪和(或)自动听性脑干反应对28043例新生儿进行听力筛查及复查,复筛未通过者利用脑干听觉诱发电位仪进行听力障碍诊断。结果3年总出生新生儿28405例,可筛总数28369例,实际筛查28043例,其中3201例因各种原因在新生儿科治疗(高危组),余无明确高危因素(正常组)。初筛率98.85%,初筛未通过率6.39%(1792/28043);应复查1792例,实际复查1183例,复查率66.01%,复查未通过率13.01%(154/1183);进行诊断患儿150例,其中70例出现不同程度听力损伤,听力损伤的发生率为2.4‰(70/28043),其中轻度损伤29例(41.4%),中度损伤25例(35.7%),重度损伤18例(12.9%),极重度损伤7例(10.0%)。正常组听力损伤检出率1.89‰,高危组检出率1.03%,高危儿听力损伤的发生率(33/3201)明显高于正常新生儿,两者比较有显著性差异(P﹤0.05)。分析33例高危儿发现早产、窒息、出生缺陷等可能与听力损伤有关。结论对所有新生婴儿应常规进行新生儿听力筛查,加强宣教,增加复筛率,早期发现,早期治疗。耳声发射仪联合自动听性脑干反应能提高高危儿听力损伤的诊断率。听力损伤的发生病因复杂,在将高危因素的患儿列为重点筛查对象的同时,对所有婴儿均应进行必要的监测,以减少儿童永久性听力损伤的发生率。 Objective To investigate incidence and high-risk factors of congenital hearing loss and explore feasible screening methods. Methods To analyze the data of hearing screening in 28 043 cases of newborn infants during 2004-2006. Results A total of 28 369 newborns was available but 28 043 newborns (98.85%) were for initial screening before discharge from hospital The neonates who failed in the first screening were 6.39%, the second failed grades were 13.01%. The rate of neonatal congenital hearing loss was 2.4‰, and mild, moderate, severe and profound grade were 41.4%, 35.7%, 12.9%, 10.0% respectively. There was significant difference in neonatal hearing loss incidence between normal infants and infants with high-risk factors, and infants with high-risk factors would induce more neonatal hearing loss. Premature delivery, neonatal asphyxia, birth abnormality were associated with neonatal hearing loss. Condusious Routine hearing screening is necessary. The incidence of congenital hearing loss is more higher in neonatal infants with high-risk factors. OAE and AABR are good methods to screen infants with high-risk factors of hearing loss, It is very important to monitor the abnormal infants.
出处 《北京医学》 CAS 2008年第3期159-162,共4页 Beijing Medical Journal
关键词 新生儿 听力筛查 听力障碍 高危因素 Newborn Hearing screening Hearing loss High-risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献20

  • 1王传军,杨广红,崔香莲,王继志,纪玉珍.新生儿听力筛查研究分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2005,20(9):1088-1090. 被引量:5
  • 2祁伯祥,林小娟,柳炯,杨于嘉,赵素萍.新生儿重症监护病房中高危新生儿听力筛查研究[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2005,11(4):232-235. 被引量:21
  • 3聂迎玖 蔡正华 等.新生儿听力普遍筛查模式的研究及应用[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2001,9.
  • 4American Academy of Pediatrics. Newborn and infant hearing loss:detection and intervention[J]. Pediatrics, 1999,103:527-530.
  • 5Magnuson M, Hergils L. The parents' view on hearing screening in newborns [J]. Scand Audiol, 1999,28(1):47-56.
  • 6Watkin PM,Beckman A, Baldwin M. The views of parents of parents of hearing impaired children on the need for neonatal hearing screening[J]. Br J Audiol, 1995, 29(5):259-262.
  • 7Erenberg A, Lemons J, Sia C, et al. Newborn and infant heating loss:detection and intervention. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Newborn and Infant Heating, 1998 - 1999[J]. Pediatrics, 1999,103 : 527.
  • 8Vohr BR, Widen JE, Cone-Wesson B. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: characteristics of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and well - baby nursery[ J]. Ear Hear, 2000,21 : 373.
  • 9美国婴幼儿听力联合委员会.2000年形势报告.早期听力检测和干预原则和指导方针[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志(新生儿听力筛查专刊),2001,9:16-16.
  • 10Jakubikova J, Kabatova Z, Zavodna M. Identification of hearing loss in newborns by transient otoacoustic emissions[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2003, 67(1) : 15 - 18.

共引文献75

同被引文献189

引证文献28

二级引证文献140

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部