期刊文献+

基于协整与Granger因果分析的地区一体化进程研究——以京津冀和长三角为例 被引量:19

A Study on the Regional Integration Process Based on Co-integration and Granger Test——With Jing-Jin-Ji Region and Yangzi River Delta as A Case
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于协整分析和Granger因果检验,分析了京津冀和长三角1980年以来地区一体化发展进程。研究发现,从总体上看,京津冀和长三角地区一体化进程都在不断加深。京津冀地区,1980—1992年,北京与天津、北京与河北间都不存在Granger关系,天津和河北不存在协整关系;1993—2004年间,京津冀区域一体化不断加深,北京是河北、北京是天津的Granger原因;长三角地区,上海与江苏不存在协整关系,1980—1992年,上海与浙江、江苏与浙江之间不存在Granger因果关系,而在1992—2004年,上海与浙江、江苏与浙江均存在Granger因果关系。 This paper examines the regional integration process of Jing-Jin-Ji region and Yangzi River delta based on co-integration and Granger test from the year of 1980. The research shows that the courses of integration both in Jing-Jin-Ji region and Yangzi River delta are deepening continually in general. More specific results are as follows : ( 1 ) In the region of Jing-Jin-Ji, there was not a Granger relation between Beijing and Tianjing from 1980 to 1992. It was also the case between Beijing and Hebei. There did not exist co-integration between Tianjin and Hebei in the same period; (2) During the period of 1993 to 2004, the integration process of Jing-Jin-Ji region was strengthened constantly. Beijing was the Granger reason of Hebei and Tianjin simultaneously; (3) In the delta of Yangzi River, there did not exist co-integration between Shanghai and Jiangshu. Interestingly, there was not a Granger relationship between Shanghai and Zhejiang, there was not a Granger relationship between Shanghai and Jiangsu from 1980 to 1992. Also, it was the case between Shanghai and Zhejiang. However, from 1992 to 2004, there was a Granger causality relationship both between Shanghai and Zhejiang and between Jiangsu and Zhejiang.
出处 《地域研究与开发》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期30-33,共4页 Areal Research and Development
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70303019) 福建省新世纪优秀人才计划资助项目
关键词 地区一体化 GRANGER因果关系 京津冀 长三角 regional integration Granger test Jing-Jin-Ji Yangzi River delta
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献23

  • 1黄肖广.财政体制改革与地方保护主义[J].经济研究,1996,31(2):37-40. 被引量:15
  • 2Arellano, M., Bond, S., 1991, Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies 58, 277-297.
  • 3Bai, C.E., Li, D.D., Tao, Z.G., Wang, Y.J., 2000, A Multitask Theory of State Enterprise Reform. Journal of Comparative Economics 28, 716-738.
  • 4Bai, C.E., Du, Y.J., Tao, Z.G. and Tong, Y.T. , 2002, Protectionism and Regional Specialization: Evidence from China's Industries.The University of Hong Kong Mimeo.
  • 5Dumais, G., Ellison, G. and Glaeser, E., 2002, Geographic Concentration as a Dynamic Process. Review of Economics and Statistics 84,193-204.
  • 6Ellison, G. and Glaeser, E., 1997, Geographic Concentration in US Manufacturing Industries: a Dartboard Approach. Journal of Political Economy 105, 889-927.
  • 7Greene, W.H., 2000, Econometric Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River.
  • 8Hanson, G.H., 2001, Scale Economies and the Geographic Concentration of Industry. Journal of Economic Geography 1, 255-276.
  • 9Hoover, E.M., 1936, The Measurement of Industrial Localization. Review of Economics and Statistics 18, 162-171.
  • 10Kim, S. , 1995, Expansion of Markets and the Geographic Distribution of Economic Activities: The Trends in US Regional Manufacturing Structure, 1860-1987. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 881-908.

共引文献984

同被引文献166

引证文献19

二级引证文献164

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部