期刊文献+

宫颈电环切术对妊娠时限及分娩方式的影响 被引量:30

The Effect of Loop Electrosurgical Excision on Pregnancy Duration and Mode of Delivery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨宫颈上皮内瘤变患者行宫颈电环切术对妊娠时限、分娩方式及新生儿情况的影响。方法:选择因宫颈上皮内瘤变而行宫颈电环切术,于术后妊娠并分娩的32例产妇为研究组,同时取同期分娩且孕前未行任何宫颈手术的产妇64例为对照组,观察两组间的妊娠时限、分娩方式及新生儿出生体重等指标的差异。结果:两组资料可比性强。研究组早产3例,剖宫产16例,2例新生儿出生体重<2500g。对照组早产7例,剖宫产30例,6例新生儿出生体重<2500g。两组间早产率、剖宫产率、低出生体重儿率差异均无显著性(P>0.05)。结论:宫颈电环切术是治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变安全有效的方法,不会增加随后妊娠的剖宫产率、早产率和低出生体重儿率。 Objective:To investigate the effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure(LEEP) on duration of pregnancy, mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Methods:A retrospective cohort study was performed. The study group enrolled 32 women, who gave birth after previous LEEP treatment for CIN. The control group had 64 women with no history of cervical surgery, who delivered within the same period. The duration of pregnancy, mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes were analyzed.Results:The numbers of preterm birth, cesarean delivery and low birth weight in study group are 3, 16, 2 cases respectively. While in control group, numbers were 7, 30, and 6 respectively. Duration of pregnancy, incidence of preterm birth and low birth weight were not significantly different between the two groups ( P〉 0.05) .Conclusions= LEEP is a safe and effective treatment for CIN. It does not increase the risk of cesarean delivery, preterm birth or low birth weight infant.
出处 《实用妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期109-112,共4页 Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 宫颈电环切术 宫颈上皮内瘤变 妊娠时限 分娩方式 新生儿结局 Loop electrosurgical excisional procedure Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Duration of pregnancy Mode of delivery Neonatal outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Perlman SE, Lubianca JN, Kahn JA. Characteristics of a group of adolescents undergoing loop electrical excision procedure (LEEP)[ J ]. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 2003,16( 1 ) : 15 - 20.
  • 2Samson SL, Bentley JR, Fahey TJ, et al. The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcqme[ J ]. Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 105(2) :325 - 332.
  • 3Ferenczy Q, Choukroun D, Falcone T, et al. The effect of cervical loop electrosurgical excision on subsequent pregnancy outcome: Noith American experience[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1995, 172(4 Pt 1):1246- 1250.
  • 4Nφhr B, Tabor A, Frederiksen K, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and the subsequent risk of preterm delivery[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2007, 86(5): 596-603.
  • 5Acharya G, Kjeldberg I, Hansen SM, et al. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the mangement of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2005, 272(2): 109- 112.
  • 6Althuisius SM, Schoormagel IJ, Dekker GA, et al. Loop Electrosurgical excision procedure of the cervix and time of delivery in subsequent pregnaney[J]. lnt J Gynaecol Obstest (Delang), 2001, 72(1): 31-34.
  • 7Berghella V, Pereira L, Gariepy A, et al. Prior cone biopsy: prediction of preterm birth by cervical ultrasound[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004,191(4): 1393- 1397.
  • 8Paraskevaidis E, Koliopoulos G, Lolis E, et al. Delivery outcomes following loop electrosurgicsl excision procedure for microinvasive ( FIGO stage IA1) cervical cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2(102, 86(1): 10-13.
  • 9Crane JM. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a systematic review[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 102(5 Pt 1): 1058 - 1062.

同被引文献162

引证文献30

二级引证文献122

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部