期刊文献+

地铁站台煤油火灾烟气蔓延的数值模拟

Numerical Simulation of Kerosene Fire/Smoke Spread over Subway Station Platform
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以沈阳地下铁路工程为例.利用计算流体力学的SIMPLE算法,在5种防排烟方式下,对地铁站台煤油火灾烟气的蔓延情况进行数值模拟.选取距地铁站台地面2m平面上,两楼梯口中心点作为测点,得到了不同防排烟情况下测点温度及CO_2摩尔分数的实时曲线,及地铁火场温度和CO_2浓度场云图,分析不同的防排烟方式对地铁站台煤油火灾烟气蔓延情况的影响.模拟结果表明,当仅使用机械排烟时,排烟口位置不同,排烟效果相差不大.加压送风系统与机械排烟同时使用,能有效遏制烟气蔓延,并出现周期性衰减的情况;远离火源的楼梯口可作为更加安全的疏散通道. Based on the Shenyang subway project, a numerical simulation of kerosene fire/smoke spread over the subway station platform was performed by the software CFD and SIMPLE algorithm for fluid mechanics, including 5 different types of smoke exhaust systems. The centers of two stairway openings on the plane 2 m above platform floor were taken as test points where the time-dependent relationship between temperature and CO2 mole fraction and the cloud charts of fire scene temperature and CO2 concentration fields were obtained to analyze how the different ways to exhaust smoke affect the spread of fire/smoke at subway station platform. The results showed that when the mechanical smoke exhauster is used solely, the position difference of exhauster outlets affects unobviously the fire/smoke control effectiveness. But, the exhauster in combination with forced draft system can inhibit more efficiently the spread of fire/smoke though periodical attenuation is found during the inhibition. The stairway farther from the fire center is proved the safer exit for human evacuation.
出处 《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第3期412-415,共4页 Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基金 辽宁省教育厅科技攻关项目(2004C001) 国家外专局引智项目(20072100244).
关键词 地铁 火灾 机械排烟 加压送风 数值模拟 SIMPLE算法 subway fire mechanical smoke exhauster forced draft numerical simulation SIMPLE algorithm
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Park W H, Kim D H, Chang H C. Numerical predictions of smoke movement in a subway station under ventilation[J ]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2006,21 (3) :304 - 305.
  • 2Slusarczyk J, Sinclair J R. Evaluation of emergency ventilation in three subway stations[C]//Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of Aerodynamics and Ventilation of Vehicle Tunnel. Boston: BHR Group, 2000: 491 - 510.
  • 3Jain S, Kumar S. Numerical simulation of fire in a tunnel: comparative study of CFAST and CFX predictions [ J ]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2007,27 (4) : 583 - 584.
  • 4Hur N, Won C S. A numerical simulation of the trackway exhaust system for underground stations of Seoul 9th line:ventilation operation and smoke exhaust operation in case of a carriage fire [ C] //Proceedings of the llth International Conference of Aerodynamics and Ventilation of Vehicle Tunnel. Boston:BHR Group, 2003:231 - 242.
  • 5Rie D H, Hwang M W, Kim S J. A study of optimal vent mode for the smoke control of subway station fire [ J ]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2006,21 (3) :300 - 301.
  • 6Zigh A, Ong I. CFD application for subway stations[C]// Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of Aerodynamics and Ventilation of Vehicle Tunnel. Boston: BHR Group, 2000:939 - 952.
  • 7蔡波,李辉亮,廖光煊.地铁火灾中强制通风烟控系统作用的模拟[J].中国工程科学,2005,7(8):80-83. 被引量:13
  • 8Gabay D. Fire safety: a short history in the Paris subway [ J ]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2002,17(2) : 139 - 143.
  • 9Hu L H, Huo R, Wang H B. Experimental studies on fire- induced buoyant smoke temperature distribution along turmd ceiling[ J ]. Building and Environment, 2007, 42 ( 11 ) : 3905 - 3915.
  • 10张培红,陈宝智,卢兆明.人员应急疏散行动开始前的决策行为[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2005,26(2):179-182. 被引量:42

二级参考文献16

  • 1Proulx G, Fahy R. A study of the New York Trade Centre evacuation [ A ]. Proceedings of ASIAFLAM'95 - An International Conference on Fire Science and Engineering[C]. Hong Kong, 1995. 199- 210.
  • 2Takagi T,Sugeno M. Fuzzy identification of systerrrs and its application to modeling and control [J ]. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, 1985,15 (2) : 116 - 132.
  • 3Jang R J S. ANFIS: Adapfive-network-bssed fuzzy inference system [ J ]. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics, 1993,23(3) : 665 - 685.
  • 4Hayes N. Introduction to cognitive proces.ges [ M]. London:The British Psychological Society, 1991.23 - 154.
  • 5Bryan J L. Behavior response to fire and smoke[A]. The SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering [ M ]. 2nd ed. Quincy: NFPA, 1995. 241 - 262.
  • 6Canter D. Studies of human behaviour in fire: empirical results and their implications for education and design[A].Building Research Establishment Report [C]. Herts: Fire Research Station, 1985.1 - 20.
  • 7Wood P G. A survey of behavior in fires[A]. Fires and Human Behaviour [ C]. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons,1980.83 - 97.
  • 8Paul J. A personal perspective on research consulting and codes/standards development in fire-related human behaviour, 1969 + 1999, with an emphasis on space and time factors[J]. Fire and Material, 1999,23(3):265 -272.
  • 9Sime J. Human behaviour in fires - summary report[A].Report No. 45, Building Use & Safety Research Unit [C].Portsmonth: School of Architecture, Portsmonth Polytechnic, 1992. 385 - 407.
  • 10McGrattan K B. Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 3)-User's Guide [M]. USA: NIST, 2002.

共引文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部