后TRIPS时代国际知识产权法内国自决权评析

Comments on National Right of Self-determination of International Intellectual Property Law in the Era of Post-TRIPS

知识产权国际公约自身不可避免的缺陷昭示了知识产权地域性原则延续的生命力。不同国家在政治、经济、社会等方面的差异性暗示着尊重国内政策选择权应该被看作创制国际知识产权法律制度的最基本的价值目标。此外,有关国际公约的一致同意的立法模式以及国际法律文件的解释与适用决定了知识产权地域性原则依然发挥作用。

The inevitable defects of international intellectual property conventions make it clear the continued viability of territoriality doctrine of intellectual property. Social, economic and political diversities of different countries implies deference to domestic policy choices should be looked upon as the most fundamental value objective to pursue in the development of international intellectual property law system. Furthermore, the consensus-based lawmaking model of international conventions as well as the construction and application of international legal documents determines that territorialism is none the less playing its role.