2Albrechtsen H. Web - based collaboratories : From centres without walls to collaboratories in use.Journal of Digital Information Management,2004(2) :1 - 39
3Karasti H, Baker K S, Bowker G C. SCW2003 Computer Supported Scientific Collaboration (CSSC) workshop report. ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin,2003(24) :6- 13
4Sonnenwald D H, Maglaughlin K L, Whitton M C. Designing to support situation awareness across distances: An example from a scientific collaboratory. Information Processing & Management, 2004(40) :989- 1011
5Spring M B, Vathanophas V. Peripheral social awareness information in collaborative work. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2003(54) : 100,1013
6Talja S. Information sharing in academic communities: Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. New Review Oflnformation Behaviour Research, 2003 (3) : 143 - 159
7Hyldegard J. Collaborative information behaviour: Exploring Kuhlthau's Information Search Process model in a group - based educational setting. Information Processing & Management,2005 (6) : 101 - 137
8Shapira B, Kantor P B, Melamed B. The effect of extrinsic motivation on user behavior in a collaborative information finding system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2001 (52) : 879 - 887
9Poltrock S, Grudin J, Dumais S, Fidel B, Bruce H, Pejtersen A M. Information seeking and sharing in design teams. Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, 2003 : 239 - 247
10Fidel R, Pejtersen A M, Cleal B,Bruce H. A multidimensional approach to the study of human - information interaction: A case study of collaborative information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Ikchnology, 2004(55) :939- 953
2Saracevic T. Modeling Interaction in Information Retrieval (IR): A Review and Proposal. In: Hardin S (Ed.). Proceedings of the 59th ASIS Annual Meeting Medford. NJ:Information Today, 1996. 3-9.
3Wang P, Hawk W B, Tenopir C. Users'Interaction with World Wide Web Resources: An Exploratory Study Using a Holistic Hpproach. Information Processing & Management, 20130, 36:229-251.
4Khan K,Locatis C. Searching Through Cyberspace: The Effects of Link Display and lank Density on Information Retrieval from Hypertext on the World Wide Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998a, 49:176-182.
5Khan K, Locatis C. Searching Through Cyberspace: The Effects of Link Cues and Correspondence on Information Retrieval from Hypertext on the World Wide Web. Jonmal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998b, 49:1248-1253.
6Carlson J R, Kacmar C J. Increasing Link Marker Effectiveness for WWW and Other Hypermedia Interfaces: An Examination of End-user Preferences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1999, 50:386-398.
7Kellogg W A, Richards J T. The Human Factors of Information on the Intemet. In : Nielsen J ( Ed. ). Advances in Human-Computer Interaction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1995.
8Hoelscher C, Strube G. Web Search Behavior of Intemet Experts and Newbies. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International World WideWeb Conference. [ s. 1. ]: [ s. n. ], 2000. 337-346.
9Navarro-Prieto R, Scaffe M, Rogers Y. Cognitive Strategies in Web Searching. http: //zing. ncsl. Nist. gov/hfweb/proceedings/navarro-prieto/index, html, 1999.
10White M D, Iivonen M. Questions as a Factor in Web Search Strategy.Infonmtion Processing and Management, 2001, 37 (6) : 721-740.
