问题取向应对风格量表的信效度检验及与心理健康的关系

Reliability and Validity of Problem-focused Style of Coping Inventory and Its Relation to Psychological Distress

目的:检验问题取向应对风格量表(PF-SOC)对我国大学生的适用性,并考察其与心理健康的关系。方法:翻译PF-SOC并完成返回翻译,分别对2个样本共517名学生发放结构性问卷进行施测,使用PSI作同时效度分析,BDI、SES、MBI-SS和UWES-S为效标关联效度的测量指标。结果:(1)探索性和验证性因素分析表明修订后量表符合原版量表结构(χ2/df=2.09,NFI、NNFI、CFI接近0.90),3个分量表(思考型、压抑型和反应型)的内部一致性系数分别为0.73、0.70和0.72;(2)除在思考型维度上有性别差异外(男23.8±4.2/23.1±4.7,F=143.07,P<0.05),其余结果表明不存在性别、年级和文理科差异;(3)PF-SOC能有效预测抑郁、特质焦虑、学业倦怠与投入(ΔR2=10%-24%)。结论:中文版PF-SOC具有较好的信效度,并能预测大学生心理健康状况。

Objective：To examine the applicability of Problem-focused Style of Coping Inventory（PF-SOC）in Chinese college students,and its relationship with psychological distress.Methods：PF-SOC was translated and back translated.Two samples in a total of 517 college students completed a battery of structured questionnaires,using PSI（problems solving inventory）,BDI（Beck Depression Inventory）,SES（self esteem scale）,MBI-SS（Maslach Burnout Scale-Student Survey）and UWES-S（Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-Student）for validity test.Results：（1）Results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis showed that the revised Chinese PF-SOC obtained similar structure as the original version.The Cronbach＇s α of the three PF-SOC subscales（reflective,suppressive and reactive）were 0.73,0.70 and 0.72 respectively.（2）Beside the gender difference in reflective subscale（male：23.8±4.2/female 23.1±4.7,F = 143.07,P〈0.05）,no differences were found among gender,grades and major stream in PF-SOC.（3）Psychological distress including depression,anxiety,academic burnout and engagement were significantly predicted by PF-SOC（ΔR^2 ranged from 10%-24%）.Conclusion：PF-SOC is reliable and valid in Chinese college students,and it is practical in predicting college students＇ mental health status.