期刊文献+

退化红壤不同植被恢复类型的土壤弹尾虫群落结构 被引量:7

Community structure of collembolan in degraded red soil under different restoration vegetation types
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以退化红壤的侵蚀裸地、旱生性草坡、稀疏针叶林、针叶林、针阔混交林5种植被恢复类型及常绿阔叶林(对照)为研究对象,对各类型植被的土壤弹尾虫群落进行了调查,共捕获弹尾虫2亚目7科23属,其中符跳属、类符跳属、小圆跳属等为优势类群.应用个体密度、类群数及多样性指数等指标,研究了植被类型对弹尾虫群落特征的影响.结果表明:各项指标以常绿阔叶林为最高,裸地最低,基本没有弹尾虫存在;旱生性草坡、稀疏针叶林、针叶林和针阔混交林4种植被恢复类型的土壤弹尾虫群落得到了一定恢复,但各类型之间土壤弹尾虫群落没有明显差异,均处于恢复的早期阶段;Bray-Curtis指数显示,侵蚀裸地与顶级常绿阔叶林的差异最大(0.99),其它植被恢复类型与顶级常绿阔叶林的差异也较明显,但各植被恢复类型间弹尾虫群落的差异较小. With the degraded red soils of eroded bare land ( Ⅰ), xeric mesophilous herbosa ( Ⅱ ), sparse coniferous woodland (Ⅲ ), coniferous woodland ( Ⅳ ), coniferous-broadleaf mixed woodland ( Ⅴ ), and evergreen broadleaf forest (CK) as test objects, this paper studied the effects of vegetation restoration on the collembolan communities in degraded red soil. A total of 23 genera belonging to seven families and two suborders were observed, including dominant taxa such as Folsomia, Folsomina, and Sminthurinus. The characteristics of soil collembolan community were analyzed by using the indices such as individual density, taxa number, diversity, abundance, and evenness. The test indices were the lowest in Ⅰ , and the highest in CK. The soil collembolan communities in Ⅱ , Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ were restored to some extent, but the restoration was still at early stage, with less difference observed. Bray-Curtis index had the largest difference (0. 99) between eroded bare land and CK, larger differences between the four restored plantations and CK, and less difference between four restored plantations.
出处 《应用生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第3期593-598,共6页 Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基金 国家自然科学基金重大国际合作资助项目(40520130223)
关键词 退化红壤 弹尾虫 植被恢复 degraded red soil collembolan vegetation restoration.
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Zhao L-J (赵立军). The community structure of Oribatei and their dynamics in Tianmu Mountain//Yin W- Y(尹文英), ed. Subtropical Soil Animals of China. Beijing: Science Press, 1992
  • 2柯欣,梁文举,宇万太,谢荣栋,翁朝联,杨毅明,尹文英.下辽河平原不同土地利用方式下土壤微节肢动物群落结构研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(4):600-604. 被引量:63
  • 3Gardi C, Tomaselli M, Parisi V. Soil quality indicators and biodiversity in northern Italian permanent grasslands. Europe Journal of Soil Biology, 2002, 38: 103- 110
  • 4Dunger W, Voigtander K. Assessment of biological soil quality in wooded reclaimed mine sites. Geoderma, 2005, 129:32-44
  • 5Andres P, Mateos E. Soil mesofaunal responses to postmining restoration treatments. Applied Soil Ecology, 2005, 33:67-78
  • 6Dunger W, Schulz HJ. Changes in collembolan species composition in Eastern German mine sites over fifty years of primary succession. Pedobiologia, 2004, 48: 503-517
  • 7Addison JA, Trofymowb JA, Marshall VG. Abundance, species diversity, and community structure of Collembola in successional coastal temperate forests on Vancouver Island, Canada. Applied Soil Ecology, 2003, ?.4: 233- 246
  • 8ZhangR-Z(张荣祖) YangM-X(杨明宪) ChenP(陈鹏) etal.Soil animals primary investigation of forest ecosystem in northern slope of Changbai Mountain[J].Research of Forest Ecosystem,1980,(1):133-152.
  • 9王宗英,朱永恒,路有成,聂献忠,陈建秀,孟文新,黄诚.九华山土壤跳虫的生态分布[J].生态学报,2001,21(7):1143-1147. 被引量:30
  • 10邓晓保,邹寿青,付先惠,姚天全,盛才余,白智林.西双版纳热带雨林不同土地利用方式对土壤动物个体数量的影响[J].生态学报,2003,23(1):130-138. 被引量:56

二级参考文献140

共引文献614

同被引文献189

引证文献7

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部