期刊文献+

试探投资者-东道国争端解决中的上诉机制 被引量:6

On the Appellate Mechanism for Investor-State Dispute Settlement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国对外签订的《自由贸易协定》和ICSID"中心"秘书处提出的有关创立上诉机制的建议对传统的"一审终审制"提出挑战。建立上诉机制有益于保持裁决的一致性、纠正适用法律错误和可能的严重事实错误以及弥补目前裁决审查机制的不足,但也存在与仲裁终局性原则相矛盾、增加待解决案件的数量以及导致争端解决制度政治化的缺限。少数发达国家和ICISD率先尝试建立国际投资争端上诉机制的行为反映了发达国家力图提升东道国对外资保护的强度;鉴于此,发展中国家应当提高警惕并采取因应之策。 This paper summarizes the recent development of appellate mechanism in international practices of investor-state disputes, such as the pertinent provisions concerning establishing an appellate mechanism in the United States' FTAs and ICSID's proposal. It also comments on the advantages and disadvantages of establishing such an appellate mechanism. Finally, it points out the conduct of establishing an appeal mechanism for investment disputes reveals the fact that the developed countries are trying to enhance the protection of FDI by host countries. Hence, the developing countries are suggested to heighten their vigilances and to take positive responses.
作者 张泽忠
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第3期39-44,共6页 International Economics and Trade Research
关键词 投资者-东道国争端 上诉机制 裁决的一致性 investor-state dispute appeal mechanism constituency and coherence of jurisdiction
  • 相关文献

共引文献15

同被引文献66

  • 1秦建荣.WTO与NAFTA争端解决机制之差异性比较研究——兼论对CAFTA争端解决机制的借鉴意义[J].广西政法管理干部学院学报,2007,22(2):58-61. 被引量:9
  • 2衣淑玲.国际投资仲裁上诉机制探析[J].甘肃社会科学,2007(6):111-114. 被引量:6
  • 3VERMEER-KUNZLI,A. As If:The Legal Fiction in Diplomatic Protection[J].EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,2007.37.
  • 4European Commission. 2013a. Directives for the Negotiation on a Comprehensive Trade and Investment Agreement, Called the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, between the European Union and the United States of America[EB/OL]. http://data.consilinm.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-11103-2013-DCL-1/en/pdf.
  • 5European Commission. 2013b. Fact Sheet: Investment Protection and Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement in EU agreements [EB/OL]. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/november/tradoc_151916.pdf.
  • 6Gus Van Harten. 2008. A Case for an International Investment Court [EB/OL]. Society of International Economic Law (S/EL) Inaugural Conference, http://ssm.com/abstract=1153424.
  • 7Peng Wang. 2015. The Political Economy of China-U.S. BIT Negotiation: Whose Decisive Pursuit of Leadership in Institutional Transformation? [J]. TDM Special Issue "The Pacific Rim and International Economic Law" 12 (1).
  • 8William Burke-White. 2008. The Argentine Financial Crisis: State Liability under BITs and the Legitimacy of the ICSID System [EB/OL]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1140628.
  • 9USTR. 2014, U.S. Objectives, U.S. Benefits in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: A Detailed View [EB/OL]. http://www.ustr.gov/about -us/press-office/press-releases/2014/March/US -Obj ectives-US -Benefit s - In-the-TTIP-a-Detailed-View.
  • 10Lauge Poulsen, Jonathan Bonnitcha and Jason Yackee, Transatlantic Investment Treaty Protection, CEPS special report no.102, March 2015.

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部