期刊文献+

语法隐喻与认知隐喻 被引量:4

A Comparative Study of Grammatical Metaphor and Cognitive Metaphor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语法隐喻和认知隐喻两种隐喻理论基于对语言的不同理解,对隐喻的研究因此呈现出不同的特点。两种隐喻理论,有四个不同点——对语言的认识不同、研究范围大小不同、对人类经验的分类不同、对"重塑"这一概念的理解不同;一个相同点——都承认隐喻是一种语义现象,都试图解答隐喻如何以其独特的方式表达意义这一核心问题。 Grammatical metaphor and cognitive metaphor have their different interpretations of language, so the relevant studies have different features. The two theories are different in four aspects, different understandings of language, different research scopes, different ways of classifying human experience and different understandings of the concept of “ reshaping”. They share one point, that is, they both regard metaphor as a semantic phenomenon and try to interpret in their own ways how metaphor expresses “meaning”.
作者 秦德娟
出处 《云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期135-139,共5页 Journal of Yunnan Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金 2007遵义师范学院科研基金资助课题 课题编号(2007005)
关键词 语法隐喻 投射 metaphor projection domain
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Halliday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Edward Arnold. 1994.
  • 2Halliday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [ M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
  • 3Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, M. I. M. Construing Experience Through Meaning [ M ]. Continuum: London and New York. 1999.
  • 4Ungerer, F. & Schmid H. J. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics [ M ]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. 2001.
  • 5周健,陈萍."眼"的隐喻说略[J].修辞学习,2005(2):66-67. 被引量:19
  • 6Evans, V& Green, M. Cognitive Linguistics : An Introduction [ M ]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd. 2006.
  • 7Lakoff, G & Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By [ M ]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 8Lakoff, G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things [ M ]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1987.

二级参考文献6

共引文献18

同被引文献22

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部